fix(deployment): read device_index for GPU attestation report label

[baktun14]

Why

The "Attestation evidence" modal renders "GPU undefined" instead of "GPU 0" for confidential-compute (SNP-GPU) leases.

The provider's live quote endpoint returns each GPU report with a snake_case device_index, and the quote is forwarded to the UI as a pure passthrough (no snake→camel transform). GpuAttestationReport modelled the field as index, so the modal read gpu.index — undefined at runtime — and rendered "GPU undefined".

Tests didn't catch it: the mocks used the wrong field (index) and the modal spec asserted only the GPU count and the report text, never the per-GPU label.

Ref CON-540

What

• Rename GpuAttestationReport.index → device_index to match the wire contract (consistent with the rest of AttestationQuote, which already mirrors the snake_case payload untransformed).
• Read gpu.device_index in AttestationEvidenceModal.
• Fix the test mocks (AttestationEvidenceModal.spec.tsx, provider-proxy.service.spec.ts) to use device_index, and add the GPU 0 / GPU 1 label assertions that would have caught this.

Note: the downloaded JSON bundle was already correct — it passes gpu_reports through verbatim, so it already contained device_index. Only the on-screen label was affected.

Before: GPU undefined → After: GPU 0

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Fixed GPU attestation report display so GPU labels and report details render correctly using the updated GPU index field.
  • Kept the existing attestation evidence layout and download behavior unchanged.
  • Updated related validation to match the revised GPU report data shape, helping ensure attestation details continue to appear as expected.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f5684dde-0a3d-4c1a-90c0-d6e212db280e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8611654 and 1ef3d41.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• apps/deploy-web/src/components/deployments/AttestationEvidenceModal.spec.tsx
• apps/deploy-web/src/components/deployments/AttestationEvidenceModal.tsx
• apps/deploy-web/src/services/provider-proxy/provider-proxy.service.spec.ts
• apps/deploy-web/src/utils/confidentialCompute.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The GPU attestation report shape now uses device_index across the shared type, modal rendering, and related test fixtures and mocks.

Changes

GPU attestation device index rename

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Shared report shape apps/deploy-web/src/utils/confidentialCompute.ts	GpuAttestationReport now exposes device_index instead of index.
Modal and fixture updates apps/deploy-web/src/components/deployments/AttestationEvidenceModal.tsx, apps/deploy-web/src/components/deployments/AttestationEvidenceModal.spec.tsx, apps/deploy-web/src/services/provider-proxy/provider-proxy.service.spec.ts	AttestationEvidenceModal reads gpu.device_index for keys and labels, and the related specs and mocked attestation quotes use device_index in GPU report objects.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• akash-network/console#3359: Updates the same attestation-evidence flow and GPU report rendering path.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/deployment-attestation-gpu-device-index

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.23%. Comparing base (8611654) to head (1ef3d41).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3364      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.63%   68.23%   -1.40%     
==========================================
  Files        1088      998      -90     
  Lines       26663    24330    -2333     
  Branches     6408     5950     -458     
==========================================
- Hits        18566    16602    -1964     
+ Misses       7107     6770     -337     
+ Partials      990      958      -32     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
api	84.96% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 8611654
deploy-web	55.20% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 8611654
log-collector	?
notifications	91.44% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 8611654
provider-console	81.38% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 8611654
provider-inventory	?
provider-proxy	86.26% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 8611654
tx-signer	?

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.
see 90 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.