curriculum: add actionable assertion messages to advanced OOP checks (batch 2 of 2) - #139
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (3)Maintain Python 3.9 compatibility. Guard standard-library APIs introduced in📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md) Files:
Preserve learner-edited exercises during workspace updates. Reset snapshots📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md) Files:
Checks must use bare assertions with actionable, beginner-facing messages. Keep📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md) Files:
🪛 Ruff (0.16.2)checks/oop_advanced/oop_advanced12.py[error] 1-1: Undefined name (F821) [error] 2-2: Undefined name (F821) checks/oop_advanced/oop_advanced9.py[error] 1-1: Undefined name (F821) [error] 2-2: Undefined name (F821) [error] 3-3: Undefined name (F821) checks/oop_advanced/oop_advanced8.py[error] 1-1: Undefined name (F821) checks/oop_advanced/oop_advanced10.py[error] 1-1: Undefined name (F821) [error] 1-1: Undefined name (F821) [error] 2-2: Undefined name (F821) checks/oop_advanced/oop_advanced7.py[error] 1-1: Undefined name (F821) [error] 2-2: Undefined name (F821) checks/oop_advanced/oop_advanced11.py[error] 1-1: Undefined name (F821) 🔇 Additional comments (6)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe OOP advanced check scripts now include descriptive messages in their existing assertions. The tested conditions, validation behavior, and success output remain unchanged. ChangesOOP assertion diagnostics
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change only adds beginner-facing messages to existing assertions, with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining after normal checks and review. Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 6 files.
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Adds beginner-facing messages to 11 bare assertions across 6 files (oop_advanced7-12). AST probe confirms 0 remaining bare assertions; pytest integration test passes.
Summary by CodeRabbit