test: use Client in test_client_server_integration.py#807
Conversation
18eccd8 to
83a66f9
Compare
83a66f9 to
1bfded2
Compare
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the integration test suite to leverage the Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the client-server integration tests to use the higher-level Client interface instead of directly interacting with transports. This is a great improvement as it makes the tests more representative of the SDK's public API. The changes are well-implemented and consistent across the test suite. I have one minor suggestion to improve code clarity in the tests.
I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.
tests/integration/test_client_server_integration.py (594-595)
The client object, being an instance of BaseClient, is guaranteed to have a close method as it's defined in the Client ABC. Therefore, the hasattr check is redundant and can be removed for cleaner code.
This also applies to similar checks in:
test_client_get_signed_extended_card(line 725)test_client_get_signed_base_and_extended_cards(line 808)
await client.close()9f31edc to
f6be674
Compare
To make tests a bit higher level and closer to how it's used externally.