docs: document extract in batch job specs - #16
Merged
Conversation
AnderRV
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
extractworks per-line in a batch JSONL spec today — it passes through tozenrows_paramsand Conveyor honors it — but nothing documented it. Adds it to the README, bothbatch-jobsskills, and the JSONL pipeline template.Verified against a real batch run (job
01M0WPG13YHFQTW7HQM2GEZMM6):{html, parsed}batch estimatealready prices it correctlyextract_fieldsis deliberately not documented — any value currently returns an emptyparsedwhile the task reportssuccessfuland still bills. Filed separately against ENG-230.