Reconcile post-merge and peer-lane readiness truth - #114
Merged
Conversation
YuzeJ21
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 15, 2026 02:28
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
peer_readyaccurately as mapped peer trend context, without implying a reviewed peer relationship or peer-valuation readinessWhy
After PR #113 merged, several status and continuation surfaces still reflected the pre-merge lifecycle. Separately, selected peer-lane answers could use a stale project-status count instead of the selected profile's evidence-backed saved readiness, and the visible “trusted peer context” label overstated the underlying mapped-price trend gate.
This PR restores fail-closed source precedence and keeps reviewed-peer and peer-valuation gates independent.
Impact
Researchers see consistent saved-readiness counts across Personal, Public, and Operator Data Health. Missing or malformed evidence falls back safely or remains unavailable, while candidate peers stay context-only. No readiness calculation, threshold, generated artifact, provider, or source-rights decision changes.
Verification
Boundaries