Let a site know which Trac ticket it is being used for - #123
Conversation
908c468 to
dbb4a71
Compare
|
AI review: 0 findings across architecture, security, performance, cross-platform, tests. Reviewed the Trac-ticket-association feature (
Style / process notes (non-blocking)Nothing beyond ESLint's remit noticed. |
dbb4a71 to
7122a5a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds offline Trac ticket associations to site metadata.
Changes:
- Adds ticket reference parsing and tests.
- Adds creation and site-management UI.
- Persists associations through IPC and
electron-store.
Review findings: 4 [fix here] · 0 [follow-up]
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
src/main.js |
Persists and retrieves ticket associations. |
src/preload.js |
Exposes ticket updates through IPC. |
src/renderer/index.jsx |
Adds ticket creation and management UI. |
src/renderer/trac-ticket.cjs |
Parses and canonicalizes ticket references. |
test/trac-ticket.test.cjs |
Tests accepted and rejected references. |
| ipcMain.handle('sites:set-ticket', async (_e, sitePath, ref) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| // Empty means unlink — the panel's Unlink button and a cleared field | ||
| // both land here, and neither is an error. | ||
| const raw = typeof ref === 'string' ? ref.trim() : ''; |
| const parsed = parseTicketRef(raw); | ||
| if (!parsed.ok) return { ok: false, error: parsed.error }; | ||
| await mergeSiteMeta(sitePath, { tracTicket: parsed.id }); |
da69aa7 to
e74f825
Compare
The app knows where a site is and what state its build is in, but not what
the contributor is working on — and Core work is organised around Trac
tickets, not directories. That gap is why a generated patch carries no ticket
number, why there is nowhere to show a ticket's existing patches, and why
applying someone else's patch has no context to start from.
A site can now be associated with a Trac ticket: asked optionally at creation
("What are you working on?"), set or cleared later from a panel on the site
screen, and stored in siteMeta so it survives restarts.
Parsing lives in a pure, dependency-free module so it can be unit tested
without a DOM, following the setup-steps.cjs / update-plan.cjs convention. It
accepts what a contributor actually types or pastes — a bare number, a number
with a #, and any core Trac ticket URL with a comment anchor, trailing slash
or query still attached — and rejects the rest with a message meant for the
contributor rather than a log.
The association is deliberately local and offline: linking a ticket never
depends on Trac being reachable. That matters more than it looks. Every
documented Trac read path (?format=csv, the ticket HTML, raw-attachment/...)
currently returns 403 behind a proof-of-work interstitial for any non-browser
client, so showing a ticket's patches needs a fetch strategy of its own and
lands separately. The upstream fix is meta #8202, whose proposed ticket/
endpoint returns exactly the attachment data that panel will want.
Refs #109, part of #110.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Typing a bare word like `abc` into the Trac ticket panel reported
"Only core.trac.wordpress.org tickets are supported." — telling the
contributor their host is wrong when they named no host at all.
`new URL('https://abc')` succeeds (a bare word is a legal hostname), so
non-numeric input reached the host comparison instead of falling through
to the generic message. Only enter the URL branch when the input looks
like a URL — a scheme, a path separator or a dotted host.
Adds a test asserting the message (not just rejection) for `abc`,
`62281abc`, `#abc`, `not a url` and `https://`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: juanmaguitar <422576+juanmaguitar@users.noreply.github.com>
649427d to
f9b3982
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Suppressed comments (4)
src/main.js:643
- Tests · 🔵 low · [fix here] Creation-time ticket persistence is untested:
wordpress:setupis still classified as unreachable by the IPC harness, so droppingoptions.tracTicketor this assignment would leave the suite green. Extract the metadata construction behind a testable seam or make the clone dependencies injectable, then assert that valid input is persisted (and invalid input is not).
const ticket = parseTicketRef(options.tracTicket);
if (ticket.ok && !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(existingMeta, 'tracTicket')) {
meta[siteDir].tracTicket = ticket.id;
src/main.js:549
- Architecture · 🟡 medium · [fix here]
mis captured before the awaitedreadTrunkInfo. If the user links or unlinks a ticket while that status request is pending, this returns the old value andloadStatuswrites it back into both renderer states, making a successful save appear undone until the next reload. Re-read this field after the await (or ignore stale status results in the renderer).
return { hasNodeModules, hasBuilt, skipInitWizard: Boolean(m.skipInitWizard), initialized: Boolean(m.initialized), installFailed: Boolean(m.installFailed), trunkOid, trunkDate, updateIncomplete: Boolean(m.updateIncomplete), tracTicket: m.tracTicket || null };
src/renderer/index.jsx:2080
- Architecture · 🟡 medium · [fix here] This panel is mounted while
isPendingis true, butwordpress:setupdoes not register the site until cloning finishes (src/main.js:625-650). The input, Enter handler, Link button, and Unlink button remain active during that interval, so every attempted change deterministically fails with “Site is not registered.” Disable the mutating controls while pending or queue the change until registration completes.
<div style={{ padding: 20, border: '1px solid #dcdcde', borderRadius: 12, background: '#fff' }}>
<div style={{ fontWeight: 600, fontSize: 16, color: '#1d2327' }}>Trac ticket</div>
test/ipc-wiring.test.cjs:939
- Tests · 🔵 low · [fix here] The new tests only exercise parse rejection and the unregistered-site gate; both persistence calls in the handler can still be removed while the suite stays green. Add a registered-site test that asserts a valid reference is written to
siteMetaand an empty reference clears it.
test('sites:set-ticket validates the reference through trac-ticket', async () => {
Part of #110. **Closes #11** (the stack applies a patch from a file, a linked PR, and a Trac attachment — the whole of #11). **Stacked on #123** (base is that branch, not `trunk`) — review #123 first; this diff is only the apply engine on top of it. The whole ticket-to-tested-patch flow lands as one merge once the stack is complete. ## Why Associating a site with a Trac ticket (#123) only pays off if a contributor can act on what is on that ticket. This is the first half of acting: take a `.diff`/`.patch` file, apply it to the `wordpress-develop` checkout, and rebuild so the change can be tested. Discovering the patches from the ticket itself is the next branch in the stack. ## What this does - **Choose a patch file → preview → apply and rebuild.** The preview lists the files the patch touches, flags any that collide with the contributor's own edits, names binary files it will skip, and says whether `package-lock.json` moves (so an install runs before the rebuild). - **Revert.** The applied patch is recorded so it can be undone after a restart, and the record is cleared when a trunk update or a discard resets the tree out from under it. - The apply → install? → rebuild chain reuses the trunk-update step helper and the npm wrappers, so exit codes, cancellation and terminal streaming behave as everywhere else. ## How, and why it is built the way it is There is no `git` binary to shell out to and isomorphic-git has no apply primitive, so hunks are matched and written by hand with the `diff` package the app already bundles for generating patches. - **All or nothing.** Every file is resolved in memory first; if any hunk fails, nothing is written. Because a write can still fail on the way out (a path that is really a file, a read-only attribute, Windows holding a file open, a full disk), prior contents are captured during resolution and restored if a write throws midway. A half-applied tree is worse than an unapplied one. - **Three patch dialects, one path vocabulary.** Subversion-style Trac attachments (no `a/` `b/` prefixes, sometimes the pre-`src/` layout), git-style PR `.diff`s, and the app's own `createTwoFilesPatch` output all normalise to repo-relative paths for today's layout, in a pure module (`src/patch-plan.cjs`) shared by the main process and the applier and kept out of the renderer bundle. - **Local and safe.** Applying never touches the network. Line endings are matched on LF but written back as the file had them, so a genuinely-CRLF fixture is not silently rewritten. Paths are resolved through symlinks and refused if they escape the site folder, since a patch is untrusted input. ## Testing - `test/patch-plan.test.cjs` and `test/patch-apply.integration.test.cjs` — the applier tests run against real on-disk isomorphic-git repos. The parser is also validated against the real diff of wordpress-develop PR #7990. - `npm test` / `npm run test:electron`: **213/213** on both runtimes. `npm run lint`: clean. ## Self-review (per AGENTS.md) Ran the review in `.github/instructions/code-review.instructions.md` with the judgement pass dispatched to a fresh-context subagent. It returned **5 `[fix here]` · 6 `[follow-up]`; all 11 were fixed before this PR:** - **All-or-nothing did not hold across the write loop** — added the capture-and-rollback described above. Verified by disabling the rollback and confirming the new test fails (it reproduces the bug). - **`appliedPatch` desynced from the tree** — cleared on discard and on a trunk update's force checkout; a second apply is refused by name rather than silently orphaning the first. - **Renames were classified but not implemented** — real rename branch, and a 100%-similarity rename (no hunks) is no longer rejected as "not a patch", which would have killed any PR diff that moved a file. - **Ctrl+C could not cancel an apply** — the chain now sets the kill hook like the others. - **The test named for the invariant tested the wrong path** — added mid-write rollback, both rename shapes, reverting a deletion, CRLF preservation, and the symlink-escape case. - Follow-ups also fixed: symlink-aware path containment, EOL preservation, corrected conflict copy, a `+86 KB → +11 KB` bundle reduction by moving the parser out of the renderer tree, a floating-promise reset, and an install-step label that showed "skipped" while installing. ## Not done The `ipcMain` handler layer has no unit tests (the repo has no precedent for mocking handlers; the logic beneath them is covered), and **nothing has been exercised in the running app yet** — same manual-pass gap as #123. Both are called out rather than implied. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Part of #110. Refs #109, #11. **Stacked on #135** (base is that branch, not `trunk`), which is itself stacked on #123. Review order: #123 → #135 → this. The full ticket-to-tested-patch flow merges once the stack is complete. ## Why #123 links a site to a Trac ticket; #135 applies a patch file. This joins them: it shows the work already on the ticket so a contributor can see and test it before adding their own — the Contributor-Day failure the whole flow exists to prevent (several people writing overlapping patches because none could see anybody else's). ## What this does When a site has a ticket linked, the panel lists the ticket's **linked pull requests**, newest first, each with its state and last-updated date. "Apply…" fetches that PR's diff and drops it into the existing preview → apply → rebuild flow from #135 — so a downloaded `.diff` and a linked PR are one path from the preview onward. A Refresh button re-checks on demand. Ships the PR half of "patches on a ticket" first, deliberately: on the busiest tickets the real work is a wordpress-develop PR, and the Trac attachment list is emptiest exactly where activity is highest. Trac attachments (behind the proof-of-work interstitial) are not listed yet — the panel points at the ticket for those. ## How, and the constraints that shaped it - **PRs are found by GitHub's convention and verified locally.** A PR cites its ticket in the body, so a broad search for the number is verified narrowly against `core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/<id>` — GitHub's tokeniser matches the bare number in unrelated text, so the local verification is what makes the list trustworthy rather than merely plausible. - **The web `.diff` routes return 422 unauthenticated** (verified 2026-08-06, both `github.com/.../pull/N.diff` and `patch-diff.githubusercontent.com`), so the diff is fetched through the REST API with the diff media type. Requests go through **Electron `net`**, not a new HTTP dependency. - **Unauthenticated GitHub is 60/hour and a Contributor-Day room shares one NAT IP.** So lookups are manual, not polled; each ticket's result is cached in `electron-store` as last-known-good with a timestamp; and a rate-limited or offline answer shows the cached list *labelled with when*, never a short list presented as complete. `classifyHttpFailure` tells a spent limit — primary and secondary — apart from an empty ticket. ## Testing - `test/patch-sources.test.cjs` — the parse, verify (including the `65820` vs `658200` precision case) and rate-limit-classification logic, unit tested without a network. - `npm test` / `npm run test:electron`: **220/220** on both runtimes. `npm run lint`: clean. ## Self-review (per AGENTS.md) Ran the review with the judgement pass on fresh context. It returned **1 `[fix here]` · 1 `[follow-up]`, both fixed:** - 🔴 **Temporal-dead-zone crash** — a `useEffect` referenced the `loadTicketPatches` callback in its dependency array ~660 lines before the `const` was defined, throwing `ReferenceError` on every `SiteRow` render. The `node --test` suite has no DOM, so 220 green tests did not catch it; the review did. Fixed by placing the effect after the definition. **This is exactly why the manual pass below still matters.** - 🔵 GitHub's *secondary* (abuse) rate limit is a 403 with `Retry-After` while the primary quota is unspent — now classified as rate-limited rather than a generic error, with a test. Verified clean by the review: `httpGet` settle-once/timeout/abort, the cache cannot be poisoned by a failed lookup (only `ok` writes), no new trust-boundary hole (PR number stripped to digits; diff flows through #135's existing engine unchanged), additive `electron-store` keys so no migration. ## Not done The Electron `net` client and the two IPC handlers are not unit-tested (no repo precedent for mocking `net`; the logic lives in the pure module, which is covered). And **nothing in this stack has been exercised in the running app yet** — the TDZ crash above shows why that pass is owed before the final merge, and it is the main thing left. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Part of #110. Refs #109, #11. **Stacked on #136** (base is that branch), which stacks on #135 → #123. Review order: #123 → #135 → #136 → this. The whole flow merges once the stack is complete. ## Why PRs are only half of "the work already on a ticket". On many tickets — good-first-bugs especially — the patch a contributor wants to try is a `.diff` **attached to the ticket**, not a PR (verified live: ticket #37578 has three `.diff` attachments and one PR; before this, the app showed only the PR). This adds the attachment half, under the PR list, loaded on demand. ## What this does A **"Show Trac attachments"** button under the linked-PR list. Because Trac serves the attachment list only to a real browser (everything else hits the proof-of-work interstitial), clicking it opens the real ticket in an embedded window where the contributor clears the challenge **once**, the app scrapes the `#attachments` block, and the window closes — it is a means, not the UI. The attachments appear as a native in-app list (filename · author · date · size), each `.diff`/`.patch` with **Apply…**; non-patches (e.g. a `.txt`) are shown but marked "not a patch". Applying downloads the file through that same challenge-passing session and hands it to the existing preview → apply engine, so an attachment, a PR and a chosen file are one path from the preview onward. On demand, not on link: opening a Trac window can surface the challenge, so it happens when the contributor asks, not for every ticket. The persistent session means the challenge is passed once, not per open. ## Verified end to end against live Trac (#37578) A deterministic Electron harness exercised the real `trac-view.js`: - the window passes the challenge unattended; - the parser reads the **real** markup — 4 attachments with authors and **absolute timestamps**, the `.txt` correctly marked not-a-patch; - **the raw-attachment download is authorised by the session cookie** — a real `wp-admin/includes/dashboard.php` diff (1701 bytes) comes back. This was the one load-bearing runtime assumption, now confirmed. Also confirmed in the running app: the panel renders, the attachment list populates from the live scrape, and the PR apply→preview wiring works. ## Security (the app's first remote, untrusted content — AGENTS.md) - The window: `contextIsolation`, no `nodeIntegration`, `sandbox`, a dedicated `persist:trac` partition, and **no preload** — the page cannot reach the app or Node; only the `#attachments` HTML crosses back, read from the main process via `executeJavaScript`. - Navigation pinned to `core.trac.wordpress.org` against **both `will-navigate` and `will-redirect`** (the latter catches 3xx / `<meta refresh>`). - The parser **never emits an off-host URL**, and `fetchAttachment` re-checks the host before sending the session cookie — so a poisoned ticket page cannot get an attacker link in front of the user or leak the cookie off-host. - The downloaded diff is untrusted → flows through #135's apply engine, which defends against path traversal. ## Testing - `test/trac-attachments.test.cjs` — the pure parser: dedup, encoded names, off-host and cross-ticket rejection, absolute-date extraction, missing-metadata rows, empty input. The fixture matches the live markup (confirmed by the harness above). - `npm test` / `npm run test:electron`: **229/229** both runtimes. `npm run lint`: clean. - `src/trac-view.js`'s window/net glue is untested, consistent with the other `net` client (`github-prs.js`) — no repo precedent for mocking BrowserWindow; the logic lives in the covered pure parser. ## Self-review (per AGENTS.md) Ran the review with the judgement pass on fresh context. It returned **2 `[fix here]` (both 🔵), both fixed before this PR:** - Navigation lock covered only `will-navigate` → added `will-redirect` (3xx / meta-refresh could otherwise move the pinned window off-origin). - The link regex accepted an absolute off-host href (Apply was safe, but the filename rendered as an `openExternal` link) → the parser now rejects any non-Trac-host URL, with a test. Reviewer verified clean: window config, `setWindowOpenHandler`, host re-check before the cookie fetch, poll-loop lifecycle with `isDestroyed` guards + `destroy()` in `finally`, additive `electron-store` (no migration), no new dependency. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Part of #110. Refs #109, #11. **Stacked on #139** (base is that branch), which stacks on #136 → #135 → #123. Review order: #123 → #135 → #136 → #139 → this. ## Why A contributor arriving at a ticket wants to try the latest fix. The panel listed PRs and Trac attachments as two separate sections, but nothing said which one — across both — was the most recent. Usually it's a PR (visible immediately); but sometimes the newest fix is a `.diff` uploaded to Trac, and that was buried under the attachments button with no signal. ## What this does - The newest known patch carries a **"Latest" pill**, whether it's a PR row or a Trac-attachment row. - When the newest is an attachment, a note says so explicitly: *"The most recent patch on this ticket is a file attachment, not a pull request."* - Because attachments load on demand, "latest" is judged across what's loaded: **PRs alone until the contributor opens attachments** (the normal case), then both. Opening attachments isn't forced on every ticket — the verdict simply completes once they're looked at. ## How The comparison is a pure module (`src/latest-patch.cjs`), unit tested. A PR is dated by `updatedAt`, an attachment by its scraped upload time. A `.txt` never competes; a relative-only date ("15 months ago") can't win. The attachment timestamp is **anchored to UTC by hand** rather than parsed in the machine's local zone, so two contributors in different timezones see the same patch marked latest — a consistent answer is the whole point. ## Testing - `test/latest-patch.test.cjs` — PR-wins (normal), attachment-wins-once-loaded (the case the feature exists for), `.txt` excluded, relative-date can't win, attachments-only, empty→null, and the UTC-determinism of the date parse (PM/AM and the 12-o'clock edge). - `npm test` / `npm run test:electron`: **238/238** both runtimes. `npm run lint`: clean. ## Self-review (per AGENTS.md) Ran the review with the judgement pass on fresh context. It returned **0 `[fix here]` · 1 `[follow-up]`** — the follow-up was the timezone skew (PR date is UTC ISO, attachment date was parsed in local time), which two contributors could see differently. **Fixed before this PR** by anchoring the attachment parse to UTC, with a determinism test. The reviewer verified the key/equality logic (exactly one row marked, right row), NaN/`.txt` exclusion, null-safety, and stale-state reset on ticket switch. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Part of #110. Refs #109, #11. **Stacked on #140** (base is that branch), atop #139 → #136 → #135 → #123. From hands-on testing of the stack. ## Three fixes reported from testing 1. **The apply error persisted after Cancel.** Applying a PR that no longer fits ("…has moved on since the patch was written") showed an error; clicking Cancel dismissed the preview but left the error on screen. Cancel now clears it too. 2. **The "Try someone else's patch" sub-copy contradicted itself during a PR preview** — it said "Apply a `.diff`/`.patch` file…" while showing "PR #4496 changes 1 file". The sub-copy is now hidden whenever a preview or the apply chain is showing (the preview card speaks for itself), and the idle copy names pull requests as well as files. 3. **The failure message ran two sentences together** ("…no longer applies The checkout was not changed."). A period is inserted when the reason doesn't already end in punctuation. ## One requested addition **Apply a PR straight from a pasted URL or number**, without it having to be linked to the ticket. A "Paste a pull request URL or number" input + "Apply PR" button in the panel's idle state. `parsePrRef` (pure, `src/patch-sources.cjs`) accepts a wordpress-develop PR URL or a bare number and rejects other repos, other hosts, issue URLs and junk — including crafted `..` paths (URL normalisation collapses them, then the repo/anchor check rejects). The number rides the **existing** `previewPr → fetchPrDiff → preview → apply` flow, so a pasted PR shares the same trust boundary as the linked-PR list: `fetchPrDiff` hardcodes the repo and strips the number to digits, and the diff flows through the apply engine's path-traversal defence. ## Testing - `test/patch-sources.test.cjs` — `parsePrRef`: bare/`#`number, URL with trailing `/files` and `#…`, scheme-less, wrong-repo rejection, and issue/foreign-host/junk rejects. - `npm test` / `npm run test:electron`: **242/242** both runtimes. `npm run lint`: clean. ## Self-review (per AGENTS.md) Judgement pass on fresh context: **0 findings** across the five dimensions. It independently confirmed the `..`-traversal and foreign-repo/host rejections, that the pasted-number path introduces no new trust boundary (same `fetchPrDiff` + apply engine), that the punctuation ternary can't throw (error is truthy-guarded), and that hiding the sub-copy never strips the idle call-to-action. Pending your visual confirm in the running app for the three UI fixes and the paste-a-PR flow — these are your reported issues, verified here by tests + review. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
With a Gutenberg site now cloning, building and serving, the remaining half of "see what a Gutenberg PR does" is reading the PR and applying it. Both were hard-wired to WordPress Core: - Patch paths were always rewritten into wordpress-develop's src/ layout. That rewrite exists because a patch attached to a Trac ticket years ago still names `wp-admin/…`, but a Gutenberg diff is already repo-relative, and a top-level `wp-`-prefixed path in one would be moved under a `src/` directory Gutenberg does not have. parsePatchFiles now takes a `layout`, applyPatchToDir passes it through, and preview, apply and revert all resolve it from the site so they cannot disagree about where a file lives. - Pull requests were always read from WordPress/wordpress-develop. parsePrRef, fetchLinkedPrs and fetchPrDiff now take the site's upstream, so a Gutenberg site lists and fetches WordPress/gutenberg pull requests — and still refuses a PR from the other project, whose diff would not fit its checkout. - "Which PRs belong to this work item" is a different question per provider: a Core PR cites a Trac URL, a Gutenberg PR cites its issue as `#1234`. Added bodyCitesIssue and citesWorkItemFor; the verification stays narrow (`#658` must not match inside `#6580`, and a bare number is not a citation). The linked-PR cache key now includes the repository: Trac ticket #123 and Gutenberg issue #123 are different work items and shared one entry before. Every new parameter defaults to Core's behaviour, so a site with no project type is unchanged and needs no migration. Verified by hand that a `packages/…` diff applies to a Gutenberg-shaped tree under repo-relative, and that the same patch fails under Core's layout — which is the bug this prevents. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes #109. First step of #110, following Option A.
Why
The app knows where a site is and what state its build is in, but not what the contributor is working on — and Core work is organised around Trac tickets, not directories. That gap is why a generated patch carries no ticket number (#107), why there is nowhere to show a ticket's existing patches, and why applying someone else's patch (#11) has no context to start from.
What this does
A site can now be associated with a Trac ticket:
siteMeta, so it survives restartsParsing accepts what a contributor actually types or pastes: a bare number, a number with a
#, and any core Trac ticket URL with a comment anchor, trailing slash or?format=query still attached. Anything else is rejected with a message aimed at the contributor rather than at a log.The panel sits between the action row and the Terminal; nothing else on the page moves.
What this deliberately does not do
No network. Linking a ticket never depends on Trac being reachable.
That is a design decision, not an omission. While building this I measured every documented Trac read path —
?format=csv, the ticket HTML,raw-attachment/ticket/<id>/<file>, and evenrobots.txt— and all of them currently return 403 behind a proof-of-work interstitial for any client that is not a browser (SHA-256 hashcash,_hcccookie, escalating to an "I am human" checkbox on repeat hits; a spoofed browser User-Agent gets a bare nginx 403 instead). This also breaks core's owngrunt patch, which has parsed that page for years.So showing a ticket's patches needs a fetch strategy of its own and lands separately. Two things shape it:
ticket/JSON endpoint returning exactly the attachment data (filename, author, date, size) that panel wants. The follow-up should keep its fetch source swappable so it can adopt that endpoint when it lands.Also out of scope here: applying patches (#11), the ticket number in the patch header (#107), tickets as branches (#108), opening PRs from the app (#118).
Testing
test/trac-ticket.test.cjs— 14 tests over every accepted and rejected input form.parseTicketRefis a pure, dependency-free module so it runs undernode --testwith no DOM, following thesetup-steps.cjs/update-plan.cjsconvention.npm testandnpm run test:electron: 172/172 pass on both.npm run lint(now repo-wide after Finish the lint baseline and widen the CI check to the whole repo #119): clean.Manual: create a site with and without a ticket; link, unlink and re-link from the panel; paste
62281,#62281and a URL with#comment:3; restart the app and confirm the ticket survives; confirm "Open in Trac" opens the external browser.Fixed after manual testing
Manual testing surfaced a wrong-message bug: a bare word like
abc(and62281abc,#abc) was rejected with "Only core.trac.wordpress.org tickets are supported" — pointing the contributor at a host they never named.new URL('https://abc')succeeds because a bare word is a legal hostname, so non-URL input slipped past into the host check instead of falling to the generic message. Fixed to only treat input as a URL when it has a scheme, a path separator or a dotted host; everything else now gets "Enter a ticket number like 62281, or a core.trac.wordpress.org ticket URL." A github.com URL still correctly names the host as the reason. The reproducing test asserts the message, not just rejection — the gap the original suite missed.Rebased onto trunk after #122, so no generated bundle is included — the diff is five source files.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code