Skip to content

Clarify IRW case-study access and correct sharing preview - #2

Merged
Tyler-Windes merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
site/irw-sharing-and-access-label-20260905
Sep 6, 2026
Merged

Tyler-Windes merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
site/irw-sharing-and-access-label-20260905

Conversation

@Tyler-Windes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Changes

  • Keep the Confluence destination unchanged and label it "sign-in required".
  • Use a distinct IRW sharing card with matching OG/Twitter metadata on the canonical and legacy IRW routes. Preserve the original Workflow Intake image.
  • Extend the existing explicit validator for the new asset, actual dimensions, matching metadata and sign-in label.

Validation and limits

  • Existing local public-site validation: 119/119 checks passed; independent readback matched all 32 input bindings and 13 build entries.
  • Exact four-file diff reviewed; no CSS, homepage, workflow, permission or unrelated project changes.
  • Production browser access was denied by enforced policy before rendering. No screenshots, desktop/mobile, keyboard, console or rendered redirect pass is claimed.

Follows already merged PR #1 at 9c011c3 under the owner's publish-first authorization. Existing GitHub Pages workflow is unchanged.

@Tyler-Windes
Tyler-Windes merged commit 13bc54b into main Sep 6, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant