Don't require all contact methods for al_cover_page#1076
Open
BryceStevenWilley wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Don't require all contact methods for al_cover_page#1076BryceStevenWilley wants to merge 1 commit into
BryceStevenWilley wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Changes it from listing out all of the individual contact methods on separate table rows, requiring each to be present, to using `ALIndividual.contactMethods()`, which only shows those that are already defined. Also makes `user_needs_interpreter` optional.
0593429 to
a38c49e
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes it from listing out all of the individual contact methods on separate table rows, requiring each to be present, to using
ALIndividual.contactMethods(), which only shows those that are already defined. Also makesuser_needs_interpreteroptional.Main reason I'm making this change: this document gets emailed to the court, but only after it gets e-filed. So it results in the user getting asked substantial questions like "do you need an interpreter" or "what's your phone number?" (which is designed to be optional) after efiling happens, IMO a bad and confusing user experience. Could (should?) consider removing some of the e-mail stuff entirely maybe, but this is a good immediate fix IMO.
DOCX diff:
From: