fix: widen event parameter contingency bound to SupplementalAttribute

[m-bossart]

PSY.Contingency subtypes IS.SupplementalAttribute, not IS.InfrastructureSystemsComponent, so the event add_param_container! overload and EventParametersAttributes MethodError on real contingency types. Widen the contingency type parameter's bound and drop the unused affected_devices field, which had no readers.

[github-actions]

Performance Results
Main

Network: 10 nodes, 13 edges, 3 cost segments
Generators: 5, Demands: 5
Loss coefficients (a, b, c) per generator:
  n1: a=0.007287  b=0.005968  c=0.003850
  n2: a=0.001094  b=0.009002  c=0.007028
  n3: a=0.007897  b=0.008552  c=0.003001
  n4: a=0.008179  b=0.002530  c=0.009637
  n5: a=0.009778  b=0.009934  c=0.009099

Solver logs: /home/runner/work/InfrastructureOptimizationModels.jl/InfrastructureOptimizationModels.jl/main/test/performance/logs/solver_2026-07-31T22-06-33.log

==============================================================================================================================================
Bilinear Approximation Benchmarks
  Refinement = depth for all methods
==============================================================================================================================================
Method          R   Vars Constrs   Bins    Objective   Gap(%) MIPGap(%)     LowerBnd  rmse δbi   max δbi   rmse δq    max δq  build_t  solve_t
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NLP (Ipopt)     -     40     105      0     0.956760        -         -            -  0.00e+00  0.00e+00  0.00e+00  0.00e+00   0.0313   0.0044

NLP (Uno)       -     40     105      0     0.956760   0.0000         -            -  0.00e+00  0.00e+00  0.00e+00  0.00e+00   0.0012   0.0011

Bin2+sSOS       4    190     535      0     1.180700  23.4061    0.0000     1.180700  8.07e-02  1.41e-01  2.49e+01  5.48e+01   0.0049   1.7573
Bin2+sSOS       6    250     655      0     1.098175  14.7806    0.0000     1.098175  1.26e-01  2.86e-01  5.47e+00  9.07e+00   0.0059   7.3320
Bin2+sSOS       8    310     775      0     1.053069  10.0661    0.0088     1.052976  8.62e-02  2.43e-01  4.18e+01  9.32e+01   0.0058  26.0038

This branch

Network: 10 nodes, 13 edges, 3 cost segments
Generators: 5, Demands: 5
Loss coefficients (a, b, c) per generator:
  n1: a=0.007287  b=0.005968  c=0.003850
  n2: a=0.001094  b=0.009002  c=0.007028
  n3: a=0.007897  b=0.008552  c=0.003001
  n4: a=0.008179  b=0.002530  c=0.009637
  n5: a=0.009778  b=0.009934  c=0.009099

Solver logs: /home/runner/work/InfrastructureOptimizationModels.jl/InfrastructureOptimizationModels.jl/branch/test/performance/logs/solver_2026-07-31T22-08-32.log

==============================================================================================================================================
Bilinear Approximation Benchmarks
  Refinement = depth for all methods
==============================================================================================================================================
Method          R   Vars Constrs   Bins    Objective   Gap(%) MIPGap(%)     LowerBnd  rmse δbi   max δbi   rmse δq    max δq  build_t  solve_t
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NLP (Ipopt)     -     40     105      0     0.956760        -         -            -  0.00e+00  0.00e+00  0.00e+00  0.00e+00   0.0317   0.0044

NLP (Uno)       -     40     105      0     0.956760   0.0000         -            -  0.00e+00  0.00e+00  0.00e+00  0.00e+00   0.0014   0.0011

Bin2+sSOS       4    190     535      0     1.180700  23.4061    0.0000     1.180700  8.07e-02  1.41e-01  2.49e+01  5.48e+01   0.0055   1.7591
Bin2+sSOS       6    250     655      0     1.098175  14.7806    0.0000     1.098175  1.26e-01  2.86e-01  5.47e+00  9.07e+00   0.0059   7.3166
Bin2+sSOS       8    310     775      0     1.053069  10.0661    0.0088     1.052976  8.62e-02  2.43e-01  4.18e+01  9.32e+01   0.0059  26.0478

Bin2+mSOS       4    310     805    120     1.180700  23.4061    0.0000     1.180700  8.07e-02  1.41e-01  2.49e+01  5.48e+01   0.0024   1.7148
Bin2+mSOS       6    430    1045    180     1.098175  14.7806    0.0092     1.098074  1.26e-01  2.86e-01  5.47e+00  9.07e+00   0.0025   7.3328
Bin2+mSOS       8    550    1285    240     1.053069  10.0661    0.0045     1.053021  8.62e-02  2.43e-01  4.18e+01  9.32e+01   0.0028  17.5692

[luke-kiernan]

You're removing the affected_devices field. Looking in IOM, POM, and PSI, I don't see anywhere that field is used, but then that makes me wonder why it's here at all.

edit: oh, I see you noticed the same thing. I guess I'd like confirmation from Jose that we don't need that field before removing it.