Skip to content

Add CI typecheck gate for mission layer - #10

Open
Shakeyswings wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
feature/mission-ci-typecheck
Open

Add CI typecheck gate for mission layer#10
Shakeyswings wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
feature/mission-ci-typecheck

Conversation

@Shakeyswings

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Export mission status contract type used by repository layer.
  • Add npm typecheck script.
  • Run TypeScript typecheck in CI before lint and build.

Validation

  • GitHub Actions will run on this pull request.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8229951715

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated
@Shakeyswings
Shakeyswings enabled auto-merge (squash) July 7, 2026 00:55
Restore environment variables for Build step:
- NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_URL
- NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY
- OPENAI_API_KEY
- APP_ENV
@Shakeyswings
Shakeyswings force-pushed the feature/mission-ci-typecheck branch from b065a05 to 6b5a0d6 Compare July 25, 2026 17:45

@Shakeyswings Shakeyswings left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added the missing bash

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant