Bitwuzla-MachBV Submission for SMT-COMP 2026

[Andeviking]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Summary of modified submissions

Bitwuzla-MachBV

• 4 authors
• website: https://github.com/Andeviking/Bitwuzla-MachBV-at-SMT-COMP-2026
• Participations
  • SingleQuery
    • QF_Bitvec
      • all

Bitwuzla-MachBV-base

• 2 authors
• website: https://github.com/bitwuzla/bitwuzla/tree/0.9.1
• Participations
  • SingleQuery
    • QF_Bitvec
      • all

[martinjonas]

@Andeviking Thanks for submitting Bitwuzla-MachBV to this year's SMT-COMP!

We have executed your solver on a small number of benchmarks from each logic it should compete in (except for the parallel track). You can find the results here:

• Single Query Track: https://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjonas/smtcomp/tables/bitwuzlamachbv.table.html#/table

We have not seen any incorrect results returned by your solver (compared to the expected status of the benchmarks).

You can check whether all the results we have obtained are expected. If not, please let us know here.

Some notes:

• We have used smaller resource limits than will be used in the final runs.
• The benchmarks are scrambled by the official scrambler with seed 1.
• The column status shows whether your solver decided the benchmark as sat (true) or unsat (false).
• You can click on the value in the status column to see the output of your solver on that benchmark.

If you upload a new version of the solver and want to have another test run, let me know. We still have some time for that.

Happy rest of the competition!
Martin

[Andeviking]

@martinjonas Thanks for your work! We have submitted a new version of the solver and would appreciate it if you could test it.

[martinjonas]

@Andeviking I executed the test run with the new version and updated the table with the results at the link above.

[Andeviking]

@Andeviking I executed the test run with the new version and updated the table with the results at the link above.

Thank You !!!