Skip to content

Add export-control data transfer guard#568

Open
catcherintheroad-hub wants to merge 1 commit into
SCIBASE-AI:mainfrom
catcherintheroad-hub:catcherintheroad/export-control-transfer-guard
Open

Add export-control data transfer guard#568
catcherintheroad-hub wants to merge 1 commit into
SCIBASE-AI:mainfrom
catcherintheroad-hub:catcherintheroad/export-control-transfer-guard

Conversation

@catcherintheroad-hub
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Adds a distinct export-control and restricted-data transfer readiness guard for the Scientific Bounty System.
  • Focuses on the pre-publication gate before challenge launch, data-room access, solver workspace access, reviewer access, payout release, and IP handoff.
  • Covers sensitive topics, restricted data types, restricted participant jurisdictions, export classification, data-use agreements, cross-border access logging, NDA workflow, and payout screening.
  • Includes deterministic sample manifests, reviewer report, SVG summary, short MP4 demo artifact, and node:test coverage.

/claim #18

Validation

  • cd export-control-data-transfer-guard && npm test
  • cd export-control-data-transfer-guard && node scripts/demo.js
  • cd export-control-data-transfer-guard && node --check src/index.js
  • cd export-control-data-transfer-guard && node --check scripts/demo.js
  • git diff --check
  • ffprobe reports/export-control-transfer-demo.mp4 confirmed an 8 second MP4 demo artifact

@catcherintheroad-hub
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Maintainer-ready validation refresh for #18 / PR #568.

Current status from my side:

Scope reminder: this is the export-control and restricted-data transfer readiness guard for the Scientific Bounty System. It focuses on the pre-publication gate before challenge launch, data-room access, solver/reviewer access, payout release, and IP handoff.

Included evidence:

  • dependency-free Node implementation
  • deterministic sample manifests
  • JSON/Markdown/SVG reviewer artifacts
  • short MP4 demo artifact
  • node:test coverage

Could a maintainer please review PR #568 for merge/reward decision, or point me to the exact blocker if one remains? I can revise quickly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant