DF Reference FAQ for object Service can't be a MultiValue field

[StefanAbel-OTOBO]

When you create a new DF for the object "Service" (so I'm not sure if this is in the right repository, as it concerns both) Reference to FAQ-Article, and you mark it as a MultiValue-Field, the field-label is still there, but the field itself is gone.
OTOBO 11.0.5
ServiceCatalog 11.0.2
FAQ 11.0.2

[svenoe]

Needs to be updated to new dynamic field methods. Medium priority as old stuff works.

[stefanhaerter]

New finding: To create a FAQ reference dynamic field for object type service should - at the moment - not be possible in the first place and was an oversight. I'll push the correction.

Edit: Related to RotherOSS/servicecatalog#6.

[stefanhaerter]

The restriction has been pushed to branches 11.0 and master, effectively prohibiting creating FAQ reference dynamic fields for service.

What I also need to look into is why the FAQ system configuration prohibits additional object types for lenses and script fields.

Keeping the issue open for future work.