Changes advance to advance on time to support large intervals - #8
Merged
Conversation
suhasHere
reviewed
Jun 13, 2026
GhostofCookie
requested changes
Jun 15, 2026
GhostofCookie
requested changes
Jun 15, 2026
* MAke another version of the timequeue that doesn't use buckets. * Change to fast_time_queue. * Improve benchmarks. * Remove queue clear duration division by 5.
RichLogan
reviewed
Aug 19, 2026
Collaborator
|
This makes a huge positive difference to first-push time when constructing a time queue when the tick service is at a high value, and we should move forward with this in libquicr if we can. I can see bad effects of slow original time queue even in the local client at larger tick values. |
RichLogan
reviewed
Aug 19, 2026
GhostofCookie
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.