Repository navigation
Run with memory boosted workers for Enzyme jobs in CI - #289
Merged
Merged
Conversation
kshyatt
changed the title
kshyatt
changed the title
lkdvos
approved these changes
Oct 1, 2026
lkdvos
left a comment
lkdvos
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, although I initially got slightly confused by the naming/title of the PR. As I understand, memory_per_worker does not actually run the workers with more memory, it just uses a different guess for determining how many workers to spawn. I do agree that this is probably the right approach, but that threw me off for a second 😉
Member
Author
|
You can see from the commit message I confused myself 😰 |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Should help with the fails on 1.10 -- the new forward rules put a lot of memory pressure on.