Audit ceg-open-prs-2026-09-17, finding CEG-262-001 (CI, High, merge-blocking). Owner class CI_PIPELINE; semantic owner l9-ci-core / CEG platform CI. Filed because no agent authority covers this surface — .github/workflows/l9-analysis.yml is a non-authorizing candidate surface under the handoff, so it carries no write allowlist.
What is wrong
PR #262 deletes the owner-managed governed analysis workflow outright:
$ git diff 9c8e3cf...<pr-262-head> -- .github/workflows/l9-analysis.yml
.github/workflows/l9-analysis.yml | 186 --------------------------------
1 file changed, 186 deletions(-)
Preservation obligation PRESERVE-L9-ANALYSIS-OWNER is therefore VIOLATED: governed L9 analysis must remain represented through its owner-managed surface rather than be deleted to remove a failing check.
The root cause the audit identifies is broader than the deletion: unrelated CI/governance/Gate-test baseline remediation was folded into a feature branch. #262 also touches .github/workflows/ci.yml, .github/workflows/supply-chain.yml and .github/governance/quality-thresholds.yaml alongside the IdeaOS feature.
Why it matters beyond the workflow file
Those same CI edits are one of the two drivers of the SonarCloud C Security Rating now blocking #262 — six githubactions:S8541 findings (Omitting "--only-binary :all:") across ci.yml and supply-chain.yml. Repairing the CI baseline through its owning surface removes those from the feature PR's "new code" as a side effect.
Closure condition (from the audit)
#262 restores the owner-managed L9 Analysis surface and no longer carries unrelated CI/governance/Gate-test baseline repairs. Those repairs, if still needed, land independently through their owning surface; both PRs are then rebased and revalidated at new exact heads.
Verification
git diff 9c8e3cf7233e81070fad79c38e8b12411db63a60...HEAD -- .github/workflows/l9-analysis.yml # expect: no deletion
git diff --name-only 9c8e3cf7233e81070fad79c38e8b12411db63a60...HEAD # expect: IdeaOS surfaces only
Evidence: E002, E003, E004, E024. Authorities: AUTH-CI-OWNER, AUTH-USER-SCOPE.
Related: #262.
Generated by Claude Code
Audit
ceg-open-prs-2026-09-17, finding CEG-262-001 (CI, High, merge-blocking). Owner classCI_PIPELINE; semantic ownerl9-ci-core / CEG platform CI. Filed because no agent authority covers this surface —.github/workflows/l9-analysis.ymlis a non-authorizing candidate surface under the handoff, so it carries no write allowlist.What is wrong
PR #262 deletes the owner-managed governed analysis workflow outright:
Preservation obligation
PRESERVE-L9-ANALYSIS-OWNERis thereforeVIOLATED: governed L9 analysis must remain represented through its owner-managed surface rather than be deleted to remove a failing check.The root cause the audit identifies is broader than the deletion: unrelated CI/governance/Gate-test baseline remediation was folded into a feature branch. #262 also touches
.github/workflows/ci.yml,.github/workflows/supply-chain.ymland.github/governance/quality-thresholds.yamlalongside the IdeaOS feature.Why it matters beyond the workflow file
Those same CI edits are one of the two drivers of the
SonarCloudC Security Rating now blocking #262 — sixgithubactions:S8541findings (Omitting "--only-binary :all:") acrossci.ymlandsupply-chain.yml. Repairing the CI baseline through its owning surface removes those from the feature PR's "new code" as a side effect.Closure condition (from the audit)
#262 restores the owner-managed L9 Analysis surface and no longer carries unrelated CI/governance/Gate-test baseline repairs. Those repairs, if still needed, land independently through their owning surface; both PRs are then rebased and revalidated at new exact heads.
Verification
Evidence:
E002,E003,E004,E024. Authorities:AUTH-CI-OWNER,AUTH-USER-SCOPE.Related: #262.
Generated by Claude Code