Skip to content

Run python.zh-cn and programming.zh-cn; publish the first three-edition report #1

Closed

Description

@mmcky

Run configs/quantecon/python-zh-cn.yml and programming-zh-cn.yml at current main plus intro.zh-cn; hand-adjudicate a sample of ≥30 tier assignments and ≥50 pair categories per edition (the review-table habit from the study); write the first dated report in project-translation reports/ with S1–S3, F1–F5 per edition and stated per-class precision. python.zh-cn carries the 2026-07 resync wave over 146 files (F2 at scale) and 12 probable whole-file AI passes that QuantEcon/project-translation#22 segregated — these need either overrides or an ai-assisted reading. programming.zh-cn is engine-era from the start with multi-revision state files — the first place the state-file baseline strategy can be tried.

Part of QuantEcon/project-translation#49 (lifecycle metrics, Stage 1). Method and limits: docs/method.md.

Activity

  1. added this to the wp8-stage1 milestone on Aug 25, 2026
  2. mmcky commented on Aug 28, 2026

    @mmcky
    ContributorAuthor

    Delivered 2026-08-28. The report is merged as reports/2026-08-28-three-edition-lifecycle-baseline.md (QuantEcon/project-translation#53), with S1–S3 and F1–F5 per edition and stated per-class precision.

    What the run required, as this issue anticipated: python.zh-cn's probable whole-file AI passes took the reviewed overrides file (#12 — 7 commits to ai-assisted, 1 English re-seed to seed, adjudicated from before/after pairs rather than assumed from the plan's instance count). programming.zh-cn was the first outing for the state-file baseline strategy (#11), which agreed with script-jump on all 28 documents including the adjacent-commit edge case.

    Adjudication: 106 tier assignments and 179 pair categories sampled (seed 20260828). Tier axis 106/106 after one systematic catch the adjudication itself produced — the engine's 2026-03/04 Update translation: per-file wave read ai-assisted until #13 added the signature. Pair axis measured indicative: 58% / 58% / 36% precision with three named causes; the dominant one (unpaired additions/deletions not prose-gated) is fixable in textstrata and recommended in the report.

    Headline: human-authored prose at HEAD 20.5% / 6.2% / 0.0% across intro / python / programming; median baseline survival 48% / 65% / 96%; intro's resyncs consumed human-touched lines at 59% against a 20.5% corpus share — the 2026-08-04 finding reproduced and generalised.

    #2 (engine-version strata) and #6 (overwrite evidence) are now unblocked; the report names what each needs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions