You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Run python.zh-cn and programming.zh-cn; publish the first three-edition report #1
Run configs/quantecon/python-zh-cn.yml and programming-zh-cn.yml at current main plus intro.zh-cn; hand-adjudicate a sample of ≥30 tier assignments and ≥50 pair categories per edition (the review-table habit from the study); write the first dated report in project-translation reports/ with S1–S3, F1–F5 per edition and stated per-class precision. python.zh-cn carries the 2026-07 resync wave over 146 files (F2 at scale) and 12 probable whole-file AI passes that QuantEcon/project-translation#22 segregated — these need either overrides or an ai-assisted reading. programming.zh-cn is engine-era from the start with multi-revision state files — the first place the state-file baseline strategy can be tried.
Part of QuantEcon/project-translation#49 (lifecycle metrics, Stage 1). Method and limits: docs/method.md.
What the run required, as this issue anticipated: python.zh-cn's probable whole-file AI passes took the reviewed overrides file (#12 — 7 commits to ai-assisted, 1 English re-seed to seed, adjudicated from before/after pairs rather than assumed from the plan's instance count). programming.zh-cn was the first outing for the state-file baseline strategy (#11), which agreed with script-jump on all 28 documents including the adjacent-commit edge case.
Adjudication: 106 tier assignments and 179 pair categories sampled (seed 20260828). Tier axis 106/106 after one systematic catch the adjudication itself produced — the engine's 2026-03/04 Update translation: per-file wave read ai-assisted until #13 added the signature. Pair axis measured indicative: 58% / 58% / 36% precision with three named causes; the dominant one (unpaired additions/deletions not prose-gated) is fixable in textstrata and recommended in the report.
Headline: human-authored prose at HEAD 20.5% / 6.2% / 0.0% across intro / python / programming; median baseline survival 48% / 65% / 96%; intro's resyncs consumed human-touched lines at 59% against a 20.5% corpus share — the 2026-08-04 finding reproduced and generalised.
#2 (engine-version strata) and #6 (overwrite evidence) are now unblocked; the report names what each needs.
Activity
Validate baseline.strategy; align docs with implemented metrics (#9)
Implement the state-file baseline strategy (#1) (#11)
Add reviewed tier overrides for python.zh-cn's probable whole-file AI…
Add reviewed tier overrides for python.zh-cn's probable whole-file AI…
Add the engine's per-file commit subject to programming.zh-cn sync si…
mmcky commentedon Aug 28, 2026
Delivered 2026-08-28. The report is merged as reports/2026-08-28-three-edition-lifecycle-baseline.md (QuantEcon/project-translation#53), with S1–S3 and F1–F5 per edition and stated per-class precision.
What the run required, as this issue anticipated: python.zh-cn's probable whole-file AI passes took the reviewed overrides file (#12 — 7 commits to
ai-assisted, 1 English re-seed toseed, adjudicated from before/after pairs rather than assumed from the plan's instance count). programming.zh-cn was the first outing for thestate-filebaseline strategy (#11), which agreed withscript-jumpon all 28 documents including the adjacent-commit edge case.Adjudication: 106 tier assignments and 179 pair categories sampled (seed 20260828). Tier axis 106/106 after one systematic catch the adjudication itself produced — the engine's 2026-03/04
Update translation:per-file wave readai-assisteduntil #13 added the signature. Pair axis measured indicative: 58% / 58% / 36% precision with three named causes; the dominant one (unpaired additions/deletions not prose-gated) is fixable in textstrata and recommended in the report.Headline: human-authored prose at HEAD 20.5% / 6.2% / 0.0% across intro / python / programming; median baseline survival 48% / 65% / 96%; intro's resyncs consumed human-touched lines at 59% against a 20.5% corpus share — the 2026-08-04 finding reproduced and generalised.
#2 (engine-version strata) and #6 (overwrite evidence) are now unblocked; the report names what each needs.