Add persistent plan mode and thread goals - #48
Draft
Qjzn wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
Plan was previously treated like a one-turn send option, structured plan output could be flattened or hidden, and the frontend did not own the App Server thread-goal lifecycle. This made long-running work difficult to understand and fragile across refreshes, thread switches, and mobile use.
User impact
Users can keep Plan mode active, explicitly implement the latest eligible plan, and manage a persistent goal for each conversation without transient state leaking into another thread. Mobile actions remain reachable without horizontal overflow.
Validation
npm run build:frontendnpm run verify:frontend-normalizersnpm run verify:server-modulesvue-tsc --noEmitgit diff --checkThe broad live
test:7420:frontendrun stopped at its idle preflight because the current handling thread was still the single active runtime request; no runtime state was force-cleared.