Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 11, 2026. It is now read-only.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,25 @@
# IMPORTANT NOTICE

## HOW POLYMARKET ACTUALLY WORKS

Polymarket resolutions don't care for real-world facts. Instead, whoever has more money can arbitrarily decide the result of any market, SO BE CAUTIOS!

Example: `https://polymarket.com/event/trump-declassifies-ufo-files-in-2025/trump-declassifies-ufo-files-in-2025` resolved to YES. Reason? UMA can manipulate the results and to counter it you need to put more money into it, so, at the end it seems it's a matter of whoever has more money, decides the result instead of the actual result of it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Personal grievance inappropriately added to project README

This change adds accusatory content about Polymarket's resolution process to the official project README. The text contains a personal complaint about a specific market outcome and allegations about monetary manipulation, which is inappropriate for technical documentation of a developer framework. This content reads like a personal grievance or rant rather than legitimate project documentation. The content also contains a typo ("CAUTIOS" instead of "CAUTIOUS"), suggesting hasty, non-reviewed submission.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web


## COMPLAINT

Polymarket (NY-headquartered, Delaware/Cayman entities, now CFTC-regulated DCM/DCO via QCX) systematically defrauds users in violation of:

- CEA §§ 6, 9(a)(2), 13(a)(2) → commodities manipulation and fraud
- 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343 → wire/mail fraud
- 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)–(d) → civil RICO (pattern of wire/commodities fraud + conspiracy via UMA whales)
- N.Y. GBL § 349 → deceptive trade practices
- NY common law → fraudulent inducement, breach of good-faith covenant, civil conspiracy

by falsely advertising “objective, real-world” resolutions while allowing large UMA holders and coordinated whales to arbitrarily override outcomes for profit, turning a purported prediction market into a rigged, unregulated bucket shop under the cover of newly obtained U.S. federal registration.

This conduct is actionable in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under New York governing law and federal commodities statutes. Immediate demands: full restitution, permanent fraud warning banner, and elimination of UMA override mechanism, or face immediate SDNY lawsuit with class and treble-damage claims plus CFTC/DOJ referral.

<!-- PROJECT SHIELDS -->
[![Contributors][contributors-shield]][contributors-url]
[![Forks][forks-shield]][forks-url]
Expand Down