Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions changelog.d/ca-ssp-blind-food-allowance.fixed.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Stop the California state supplement from adding the no-cooking food allowance to the blind rates: a couple of an aged or disabled person and a blind person who is neither aged nor disabled gets the one-blind couple rate alone, and the allowance counts only where the aged or disabled amount with it is higher (WIC 12200(e)).
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -98,3 +98,162 @@
state_code: CA
output:
ca_state_supplement_food_allowance: 1_632

- name: 2026 couple of an aged person and a blind person under 65 without cooking facilities gets no food allowance
period: 2026-01
absolute_error_margin: 0.01
input:
people:
person1:
age: 70
is_tax_unit_head: true
person2:
age: 50
is_tax_unit_spouse: true
is_blind: true
spm_units:
spm_unit:
members: [person1, person2]
households:
household:
members: [person1, person2]
state_code: CA
living_arrangements_allow_for_food_preparation: false
output:
# The couple is paid the one-blind rate (WIC 12200(b)), and 12200(e)
# gives the allowance only under (c) or (d): no food allowance. The
# aged amount with the allowance, 1,233.94 + 128.87 = 1,362.81, is below
# the one-blind couple amount, so the standard is 2,238.44.
ca_state_supplement_food_allowance: 0
ca_state_supplement_payment_standard: 2_238.44

- name: 2026 aged couple with one blind spouse without cooking facilities gets the aged couple amount with the food allowance
period: 2026-01
absolute_error_margin: 0.01
input:
people:
person1:
age: 70
is_tax_unit_head: true
is_blind: true
person2:
age: 68
is_tax_unit_spouse: true
spm_units:
spm_unit:
members: [person1, person2]
households:
household:
members: [person1, person2]
state_code: CA
living_arrangements_allow_for_food_preparation: false
output:
# Both spouses are aged, so the couple also qualifies under WIC 12200(d)
# with the (e) allowance: 2,098.83 + 257.74 = 2,356.57, above the
# one-blind rate of 2,238.44. California pays the highest category, so
# the allowance adds 2,356.57 - 2,238.44 = 118.13 to the blind amount.
ca_state_supplement_food_allowance: 118.13
ca_state_supplement_payment_standard: 2_356.57

- name: 2026 single aged and blind person without cooking facilities gets the higher of the blind amount and the aged amount with the food allowance
period: 2026-01
absolute_error_margin: 0.01
input:
people:
person1:
age: 70
is_tax_unit_head: true
is_blind: true
spm_units:
spm_unit:
members: [person1]
households:
household:
members: [person1]
state_code: CA
living_arrangements_allow_for_food_preparation: false
output:
# The aged amount with the (e) allowance, 1,233.94 + 128.87 = 1,362.81,
# is above the blind amount of 1,318.32 (WIC 12200(a), (c), (e)). The
# allowance adds 1,362.81 - 1,318.32 = 44.49 to the blind amount.
ca_state_supplement_food_allowance: 44.49
ca_state_supplement_payment_standard: 1_362.81

- name: 2026 aged couple with both spouses blind without cooking facilities gets the aged couple amount with the food allowance
period: 2026-01
absolute_error_margin: 0.01
input:
people:
person1:
age: 70
is_tax_unit_head: true
is_blind: true
person2:
age: 68
is_tax_unit_spouse: true
is_blind: true
spm_units:
spm_unit:
members: [person1, person2]
households:
household:
members: [person1, person2]
state_code: CA
living_arrangements_allow_for_food_preparation: false
output:
# The aged couple amount with the (e) allowance, 2,098.83 + 257.74 =
# 2,356.57, is above the two-blind rate of 2,324.35 (WIC 12200(a), (d),
# (e)). The allowance adds 2,356.57 - 2,324.35 = 32.22.
ca_state_supplement_food_allowance: 32.22
ca_state_supplement_payment_standard: 2_356.57

- name: 2026 couple of a disabled person and a blind person under 65 without cooking facilities gets no food allowance
period: 2026-01
absolute_error_margin: 0.01
input:
people:
person1:
age: 50
is_tax_unit_head: true
is_disabled: true
meets_ssi_disability_criteria: true
person2:
age: 45
is_tax_unit_spouse: true
is_blind: true
spm_units:
spm_unit:
members: [person1, person2]
households:
household:
members: [person1, person2]
state_code: CA
living_arrangements_allow_for_food_preparation: false
output:
# As for an aged person: the one-blind couple rate under WIC 12200(b),
# 2,238.44, is above 1,233.94 + 128.87 = 1,362.81, and (e) adds nothing.
ca_state_supplement_food_allowance: 0
ca_state_supplement_payment_standard: 2_238.44

- name: 2025 single aged and blind person without cooking facilities gets the aged amount with the food allowance
period: 2025-01
absolute_error_margin: 0.01
input:
people:
person1:
age: 70
is_tax_unit_head: true
is_blind: true
spm_units:
spm_unit:
members: [person1]
households:
household:
members: [person1]
state_code: CA
living_arrangements_allow_for_food_preparation: false
output:
# 1,206.94 + 128.87 = 1,335.81 is above the 2025 blind amount of 1,291.32,
# so the allowance adds 1,335.81 - 1,291.32 = 44.49.
ca_state_supplement_food_allowance: 44.49
ca_state_supplement_payment_standard: 1_335.81
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,7 +48,11 @@
state_code: CA
living_arrangements_allow_for_food_preparation: false
output:
ca_state_supplement_payment_standard: 2_639
# Both spouses are aged, so the couple takes the higher of the one-blind
# rate, 1,295, and the aged couple amount with the food allowance, 1,167
# + 136 = 1,303 (WIC 12200(b), (d), (e)). With the 499 dependent amount
# and the 709 out-of-home care amount: 1,303 + 499 + 709 = 2,511.
ca_state_supplement_payment_standard: 2_511

- name: Case A ,single disabled parent with non eligible dependent child.
period: 2025-01
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,11 +4,20 @@
class ca_state_supplement_food_allowance(Variable):
value_type = float
entity = SPMUnit
label = "California SSI state supplement food allowance"
label = "California SSI state supplement food allowance above the blind amount"
documentation = (
"The part of the no-cooking (restaurant meals) allowance that lifts the "
"aged or disabled amount above the blind amount, since California pays "
"the higher of the two. It is the full allowance unless the unit's blind "
"amount is higher than its aged or disabled amount."
)
unit = USD
definition_period = MONTH
defined_for = "ca_state_supplement_food_allowance_eligible"
reference = "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=WIC&sectionNum=12200"
reference = (
"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=WIC&sectionNum=12200",
"https://secure.ssa.gov/apps10/poms.nsf/lnx/0501415058",
)

def formula(spm_unit, period, parameters):
p = parameters(period).gov.states.ca.cdss.state_supplement.payment_standard
Expand All @@ -17,8 +26,24 @@ def formula(spm_unit, period, parameters):
"ca_state_supplement_aged_disabled_count", period
)
# Food allowance amount
return where(
allowance = where(
is_married & (aged_disabled_count == 2),
p.allowance.food.married,
p.allowance.food.single,
)
# WIC 12200(e) adds the allowance only to the aged or disabled amount
# under (c) or (d), not to the blind amounts under (a) or (b), and
# California pays the highest category (POMS SI 01415.058 B.2.a note).
# So the allowance counts only as far as it lifts the aged or disabled
# amount above the blind amount; a couple of an aged person and a blind
# person who is neither aged nor disabled gets none. POMS code C adds
# the individual allowance for that couple; PolicyEngine follows the
# statute (ruled 2026-10-29, PR 10379 comment 6509402355).
aged_disabled_amount = spm_unit(
"ca_state_supplement_aged_disabled_amount", period
)
# The higher of the blind and the aged or disabled amounts.
aged_blind_disabled_amount = spm_unit(
"ca_state_supplement_aged_blind_disabled_amount", period
)
return max_(aged_disabled_amount + allowance - aged_blind_disabled_amount, 0)
14 changes: 6 additions & 8 deletions source_conflicts/candidates.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1394,9 +1394,9 @@ candidates:
other: POMS adds the individual restaurant meals allowance for the aged or disabled member of a couple with one
blind member whose living arrangement lacks cooking facilities.
example: In January 2026, a couple of an aged person and a blind person aged 50 without cooking facilities has a
$2,238.44 standard under the statute, which PE-US follows for CAPI, and $2,367.31 under POMS.
$2,238.44 standard under the statute, which PE-US follows, and $2,367.31 under POMS.
pe_us:
follows: conflicting-source
follows: statute
code:
- policyengine_us/variables/gov/states/ca/cdss/capi/_ca_capi_ssi_ssp_standard.py
- policyengine_us/variables/gov/states/ca/cdss/state_supplement/payment_standard/ca_state_supplement_food_allowance.py
Expand All @@ -1412,12 +1412,10 @@ candidates:
note: 'Ruled 2026-10-29 for the statute by the project lead for the Medicaid fixes; the ruling record is
https://github.com/PolicyEngine/policyengine-us/pull/10379#issuecomment-6509402355. WIC 12200(e) gives the
no-cooking allowance only under (c) and (d), so a couple paid the one-blind rate under (b) gets none, in CAPI and
in the state supplement. CAPI follows the statute: _ca_capi_ssi_ssp_standard.py adds no food allowance to the
one-blind couple rate, and a couple both aged or disabled takes the aged or disabled rate with the couple
allowance when that is higher. Until PolicyEngine/policyengine-us#10546 merges, the state supplement follows
POMS: ca_state_supplement_food_allowance.py adds the individual allowance for the aged or disabled member, so in
January 2026 the same couple has a $2,367.31 standard as citizens and $2,238.44 as CAPI recipients. That PR
makes the state supplement follow the statute and sets pe_us.follows to statute.'
in the state supplement. CAPI (_ca_capi_ssi_ssp_standard.py) and the state supplement
(ca_state_supplement_food_allowance.py) both follow the statute: neither adds a food allowance to the one-blind
couple rate, and a couple both aged or disabled takes the aged or disabled rate with the couple allowance when
that is higher.'
- id: us-ca:ssp-nmohc-couple-standard
program: ssi-ssp
years:
Expand Down
Loading