Release 0.10.5a1 - #56
Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 13 commits into
Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 13 commits into
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 13 commits into
Conversation
…rdcoded pyproject value (#46) pyproject.toml pinned `version = "0.1.1a1"` under the hatchling backend, so every build shipped that exact string no matter how far version.py had been bumped by the release automation. Every dev-merge alpha publish since April has failed on PyPI with 400 File already exists because the wheel/sdist always claimed 0.1.1a1. Switch to the setuptools backend with dynamic version sourced from nebulento.version.__version__, matching the working palavreado/jurebes/linha-fina setup, so alpha publishes track the real bumped version again.
…on (#48) ovos-workshop's register_entity_file() emits entity registration names as <skill_id>:<entity>_<md5hex32>. Nebulento's own slot-tagging contract (IntentContainer.match_fuzzy) requires the registered entity name to be the bare token that appears literally as {token} in the skill's own intent templates, so a skill_id-prefixed and/or hash-suffixed name can never satisfy that check - the entity value is found in the sentence but never tagged into match_data, and detach_entity/deregister can never find the stored key to remove it either. Same wildcard/orphaned-slot bug class as ovos-padatious-pipeline-plugin#95, ported and adapted to nebulento's own bare-token lookup contract (which also strips the skill_id prefix, not just the hash, since templates never carry it). > 🤖 Auto-generated by Claude Fable 5 (claude-fable-5) via Claude Code — NOT human-reviewed. Verify before acting.
… fixture (#53) * fix: pass skill_id to ovoscope helpers and fix the malformed-template fixture Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * build: declare the ovoscope>=1.8.1a1 floor in the dev extra The e2e tests pass skill_id to the ovoscope helpers, and 1.8.1a1 is the first release that accepts it, but no extra declared ovoscope at all. CI got it from the ovoscope.yml pre-release install. A user with ovoscope stable 1.5.0 and nebulento[test] gets 11 failed in test_ovoscope_e2e.py. With the floor the resolver refuses 1.5.0 outright. Review fix item 1 on #53 (review-nebulento-53.md). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: JarbasAi <jarbasai@mailfence.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
run 35859283200
…ing sibling's (#55) handle_detach_skill picked intents to remove with a bare `i.startswith(skill_id)`, so a skill "cal" also removed intents from skill "calendar" (and any other skill whose id has "cal" as a prefix). The entity branch of the same handler already matched on the `<skill_id>:` prefix; the intent branch now does the same. test/test_detach_skill_prefix.py adds two cases: detaching "cal" must leave "calendar:reminder" registered, and detaching "calendar" must leave "cal:add" registered. Reverting only the source change makes the first case fail (registered_intents ends up [] instead of ["calendar:reminder"]); with the fix applied both pass. Full suite: 178 passed. Co-authored-by: JarbasAi <jarbasai@mailfence.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
run 36018814513
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Human review requested! This supersedes any earlier open release proposal for this repository.