Fix/allow force get user info

[santipalenque]

Allowing force pull on getUserInfo : https://app.clickup.com/t/86b8n819k

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Updated package version to 5.0.10-beta.1.

• New Features

  • Added capability to force refresh of user information, allowing bypass of cached data when needed.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 87d7d982-a921-4e20-870e-c88f72b0bc22

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7270594 and af581c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• package.json
• src/components/security/actions.js

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR updates the package version to a beta release and modifies the getUserInfo thunk creator to accept a new optional forcePull parameter, enabling callers to bypass cached member data and force a fresh fetch when needed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Package Version package.json	Updated version from 5.0.8 to 5.0.10-beta.1.
Cache Control Enhancement src/components/security/actions.js	Added forcePull parameter (default false) to getUserInfo thunk. Modified control flow to only skip fetching when both member != null and !forcePull, allowing callers to force fresh data retrieval.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

Poem

🐰 A version hops forward, beta in sight,
With forcePull now guiding the fetch just right,
No more stale cached whispers for those who dare,
Fresh member data dances through the air! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: adding a forcePull option to the getUserInfo function to allow bypassing cached state and forcing a fresh data fetch.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/allow-force-getUserInfo

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}