-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
chore(deps-dev): bump vitest from 1.6.1 to 4.1.0 in the npm_and_yarn group across 1 directory #34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: OpenDevFlow/md-latex
Length of output: 310
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: OpenDevFlow/md-latex
Length of output: 628
🌐 Web query:
@vitest/coverage-v8 version 1.6.1 compatibility with vitest 4.x💡 Result:
@vitest/coverage-v81.6.1 is not something you should rely on for Vitest 4.x compatibility. The authoritative vitest/coverage-v8 docs and package metadata indicate the V8 coverage provider is tightly coupled to specific Vitest versions (it declares peerDependencies on Vitest and@vitest/browserfor the provider build) and Vitest 4.x users should use a matching/newer@vitest/coverage-v8release. What we can confirm from sources: 1)@vitest/coverage-v8is designed as a Vitest “coverage provider” selected via test.coverage.provider = 'v8' and requires installing it as the support package [1]. 2) The package specifies peer dependencies on vitest (and@vitest/browser) for the provider implementation, which is a strong signal that a particular provider version is meant to align with a particular Vitest major/minor line [2]. 3) Vitest 4.0 introduced “V8 code coverage major changes” in the migration guide, indicating that coverage behavior/implementation is expected to change across Vitest majors and therefore older provider versions may not match expectations [3]. 4) There are also reported issues specifically around Vitest 4.x dynamically importing@vitest/coverage-v8when coverage.provider is set to "v8", which points to runtime/provider-resolution details that may break depending on install layout and versions [4]. Practical recommendation: - For Vitest 4.x, upgrade@vitest/coverage-v8to the corresponding 4.x-compatible release (rather than pinning to 1.6.1). Vitest’s coverage provider docs emphasize selecting and installing the provider package, and the provider versioning/peerDependencies indicate you need an aligned version [1][2]. If you tell me your exact versions (vitest version, v3/v4 minor, and your package manager: npm/yarn/pnpm), I can suggest the safest@vitest/coverage-v8version to use and any monorepo/workspace configuration pitfalls.Citations:
🌐 Web query:
@vitest/coverage-v8 4.1.0 peerDependencies vitest💡 Result:
In version 4.1.0 of
@vitest/coverage-v8, the package does not explicitly list vitest as a peerDependency [1][2]. However, beginning with version 4.1.3,@vitest/coverage-v8(and@vitest/coverage-istanbul) were added as optional dependencies to the main vitest package to resolve issues with dependency resolution in strict package manager environments like pnpm [3][4]. Prior to this change, users encountering resolution errors in monorepos or strict environments were advised to manually configure peer dependencies via package manager extensions (such as pnpm's packageExtensions) [3].Citations:
Align
@vitest/coverage-v8with Vitest 4.xpackages/transpiler/package.jsonusesvitest:^4.1.0but@vitest/coverage-v8:^1.6.1;pnpm-lock.yamlresolves@vitest/coverage-v8@1.6.1alongsidevitest@4.1.0, which can break Vitest 4 coverage. Update the coverage provider to the Vitest-4 line (e.g.^4.1.3).Suggested fix
"devDependencies": { - "`@vitest/coverage-v8`": "^1.6.1", + "`@vitest/coverage-v8`": "^4.1.3", "vitest": "^4.1.0" }📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents