docs: Plan 8 PR C merged — next dashboard

[messagesgoel-blip]

Summary

• Mark Plan 8 (A+B+C) complete after feat: Plan 8 PR C — decision batch ingest + HTTP flush #21 merge
• Point next session at dashboard (§13 step 13)

Test plan

• Docs-only; no runtime change

[gemini-code-assist]

Caution

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased.

[cursor]

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 48 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 87347446-a9b5-40f0-9103-bd07b319ea3f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2728cd5 and 8cbd5f8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-30-plan-8-go-edge-hardening.md
• docs/superpowers/plans/HANDOVER.md

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[qodo-code-review]

PR Summary by Qodo

Docs: mark Plan 8 PR C merged; next session is dashboard

📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

AI Description

• Update HANDOVER to reflect Plan 8 PR C (#21) merged.
• Mark Plans 1–8 fully complete (A+B+C).
• Set next work session focus to dashboard (design §13 step 13).

High-Level Assessment

The PR’s approach is optimal for this change: directly updating the handover/status doc keeps project state and next steps accurate with minimal overhead.

Files changed (1) +5 / -5

Documentation (1) +5 / -5

HANDOVER.mdUpdate Plan 8 status and next-session pointer after PR C merge +5/-5

Update Plan 8 status and next-session pointer after PR C merge

• Updates the header to reflect Plan 8 PR C (#21) merged and marks Plans 1–8 as complete. Changes the Plan 8 section from “PR C in flight” to “DONE” and records PR C as merged. Clarifies the next session as dashboard work (design §13 step 13).

docs/superpowers/plans/HANDOVER.md

[messagesgoel-blip]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📜 Skill insights (0)

Context used

✅ Compliance rules (platform): 18 rules

1. Stale Plan 8 PR C ✓ Resolved 🐞 Bug ⚙ Maintainability

Description

HANDOVER.md now states Plan 8 PR C (#21) is merged and Plans 1–8 are complete, but the Plan 8 plan
doc still frames decision ingest as a possible future “Plan 8 PR C” follow-up. This creates
contradictory status docs and can mislead maintainers about whether that work is already done.

Code

docs/superpowers/plans/HANDOVER.md[R4-6]

+> **Repo HEAD:** `main` @ Plan 8 PR C (#21) merged  
+> **Status:** Plans 1–8 done (A+B+C).  
+> **Next session:** Dashboard (design §13 step 13)

Relevance

●●● Strong

Team commonly accepts doc consistency/roadmap alignment fixes; similar Plan/HANDOVER contradictions
were updated before.

PR-#17
PR-#14

ⓘ Recommendations generated based on similar findings in past PRs

Evidence

The handover doc now asserts PR C (#21) is merged and the plan set is complete, while the Plan 8
plan doc still describes PR C as a potential future follow-up, so the two docs disagree on current
state.

docs/superpowers/plans/HANDOVER.md[3-6]
docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-30-plan-8-go-edge-hardening.md[98-105]
PR-#21

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
`docs/superpowers/plans/HANDOVER.md` was updated to mark Plan 8 PR C as merged and Plans 1–8 as done, but `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-30-plan-8-go-edge-hardening.md` still mentions “Plan 8 PR C if needed” as if it were future work. This leaves the documentation set inconsistent.

## Issue Context
This PR is explicitly about marking Plan 8 (A+B+C) complete and setting the next session focus. To avoid confusion for future sessions, the Plan 8 plan doc should either be updated to reflect PR C completion or clearly labeled as historical guidance.

## Fix Focus Areas
- docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-30-plan-8-go-edge-hardening.md[98-105]
- docs/superpowers/plans/HANDOVER.md[3-6]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

---

_{To customize comments, go to the Qodo configuration screen, or learn more in the docs.}