[codex] Reuse pre-scan bundle for interfile scans#3
Draft
mfow-nullify wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
bypass_includes_excludes_for_filesin the warmed-plan path so the status phase and scan phase use the same targeting inputsWhy
Interfile taint scans were paying the planning/bundling cost twice: once while printing scan status and again before invoking the engine. Bundling first fixes the slow scan behavior the user reported, so this change makes the scan reuse that work automatically and keeps it in memory instead of writing a separate bundle artifact.
Validation
. cli/.venv/bin/activate && pytest -n 0 -vv --tb=short cli/tests/default/unit