加的

[ForeverCherish]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the audit notes to refine one principle entry for clarity and precision.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@ForeverCherish, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 57 minutes and 39 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8ff621d0-ebe8-4c70-8ed0-914ae7176c63

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51f306f and 619fffb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

prompts/AUDIT.md has a one-line update to the Principle 4 markdown list item in section 1.2. No other audit coverage content changes.

Changes

AUDIT prompt wording

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Principle 4 text update prompts/AUDIT.md	The Principle 4 list item in section 1.2 is adjusted on line 44.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Skipped.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I tap my paws on the prompt page bright,
ერთი tiny tweak in the audit light.
A whisker of text, a nibble of rhyme,
Hop hop—done in almost no time.
🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	标题“加的”过于笼统，无法体现本次对 AUDIT.md 的具体修改。	请改成能概括主要变更的简短标题，例如“调整 AUDIT.md 中的原则 4 表述”。

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request makes a minor phrasing adjustment in prompts/AUDIT.md. The review feedback correctly identifies a grammatical issue in the Chinese phrasing, pointing out that the structural particle "地" should be used instead of "的" before the verb "解读", and provides a code suggestion to fix it.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[gemini-code-assist]

在中文语法中，“解读”是动词，其前面的修饰成分应使用结构助词“地”而非“的”。建议将“更字面的解读”修改为“更字面地解读”，以使语言表达更符合规范。

Suggested change

	4. **简洁精确优于冗长** — Claude 更字面的解读 prompt，少行精确胜过长篇。
	4. **简洁精确优于冗长** — Claude 更字面地解读 prompt，少行精确胜过长篇。