Skip to content

chore(deps): update LangChain Deep Agents Code to 0.1.71 - #12376

Open
nvidia-nemopatch-writer[bot] wants to merge 56 commits into
mainfrom
nemopatch/deep-agents-upgrade/f1fbd2ef6b194e8a
Open

nvidia-nemopatch-writer[bot] wants to merge 56 commits into
mainfrom
nemopatch/deep-agents-upgrade/f1fbd2ef6b194e8a

Conversation

@nvidia-nemopatch-writer

@nvidia-nemopatch-writer nvidia-nemopatch-writer Bot commented Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Outcome

Upgrade managed LangChain Deep Agents Code from 0.1.55 to 0.1.71 with a hash-locked Python 3.13 dependency graph, updated startup and MCP behavior, and matching onboarding and runtime validation. Preserve the existing security, lifecycle, inference, and cleanup requirements.

Changes

  • Adapt the Deep Agents image, managed patches, CLI entrypoint, native startup, persistent environment, and subprocess handling to the pinned release. Update the Nemotron profile and live version expectations.
  • Consolidate the fixture and gateway repairs formerly proposed in closed test(sandbox): preserve device files in double-source fixture #12611, test: make llama.cpp model replacement deterministic #12612, and fix(onboard): preserve gateway ownership and wait for all Linux threads #12614. Historical installer fixtures keep their historical executable reader; process and gateway checks retain exact ownership and bounded, redacted failure diagnostics.
  • For mixed-ownership native state on rootless Podman, complete the validated wipe as the image's pinned UID/GID 999 after the privileged pass. The provider rechecks the exact container handle; protected paths, timeout, final verification, fail-closed registry retention, and the public destroy assertion remain.
  • Bind the Deep Agents base-image, runtime validator, cleanup, and managed startup contract to one shared UID/GID JSON, resolving the migration and ownership findings in successive nine-specialist Advisor reviews.
  • Verify the native NVIDIA credential handle inside the OpenClaw sandbox before redaction, and accept that exact handle in the Hermes E2E config assertion. Preserve secret suppression and the later inference assertions. Record scoped, read-only Docker container-discovery evidence if Model Router onboarding fails.
  • Keep the v2 protected activation contract for candidate base-image builds, the v1 published-base path for older runs, and the existing 1,240-assertion ratchet. The source projection, cleanup, deadline, and inference requirements are not relaxed.

Verification

Current signed, GitHub-verified head: b32ea9e5a9b24df94fb4b76fe6ad793f2c482599. It refreshes both exact Pi qualification receipts and their repository-controlled SHA-256 authority from the same successful AMD64/ARM64 candidate run, without changing image inputs or the qualification guard. The exact-prior-head upstream SSH push passed normal publication validation and CLI typecheck. All 18 repository checks, 52 focused receipt tests, and normal signed commit hooks passed locally.

Core CI on this head passed all 12 CLI shards, static checks, and the aggregate gate. The managed-image run passed both Pi candidate builds, all direct managed-image startup jobs, and exact-head Docker and rootless Podman activation. Each activation exercised OpenClaw, Hermes, and Deep Agents Code for 28 agent turns, including public lifecycle phases, with zero build commands and no cleanup failures. This managed run is separate from the full E2E suite.

The automatic nine-specialist Advisor review bound to this exact PR head and base reported no findings or extra E2E selectors; its no-blockers gate passed. The coordinator result is a read-only shadow recommendation, not an approval.

The last full manual PR E2E run on d816e4f used the default target selection with Launchable opted out, no Jetson, and global mock inference; hosted catalogue profiles used actual NVIDIA inference. It finished with 75 successful, six failed, and 16 skipped leaf jobs, plus a failed aggregate gate. Hermes and OpenClaw native-switch stopped at credential-handle assertions repaired in later PR commits, but their later inference phases still need a full run. Pi native inference returned HTTP 401 on its first read task, matching a same-base main failure. Model Router could not discover its new direct sandbox container during onboarding; the next run has read-only discovery diagnostics. OpenClaw channel rebuild could not enter its gateway-down maintenance window, leaving later persistence phases unrun. These full-suite failures have not been cleared by the narrower managed run.

The protected GPU/local-inference job stopped before GPU activation because trusted main projects the candidate gateway runtime but lacks its imported same-thread-group process reader (TS2307). Ready-for-review #12928 prepares that exact reader for trusted main and is still unmerged. The candidate-branch GPU success does not qualify the trusted-main-root run; no protected workflow or trust rule has been bypassed.

Remaining qualification

After the shared process reader is adopted into trusted main, rerun the full exact-head E2E selection and resolve or clearly classify every relevant failure with evidence. A skipped CodeRabbit check is not an actual review; the bot remains ineligible for this PR. No E2E failure, review, or main merge is waived.


Signed-off-by: Prekshi Vyas prekshiv@nvidia.com

Patch-Walker-Manifest: sha256:a0f61cff523ec0832bb6e461e1dfe730a415d48e0890f72ac51a6895d69327f0
Patch-Walker-Action: sha256:b7fb4a31d109f7d4646d6d1e67c20ffc5a2cb05b77a4b014589c518fec0733f9

Signed-off-by: Prekshi Vyas <prekshiv@nvidia.com>
@copy-pr-bot

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Repository: NVIDIA/NemoClaw/.coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 932c48c4-d177-4458-8609-f5231fb18b8a

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-code-quality

github-code-quality Bot commented Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Code Coverage Overview

Languages: TypeScript

TypeScript / code-coverage/plugin

The overall line coverage in commit b32ea9e in the nemopatch/deep-agent... branch is 97%. The line coverage in commit 63002cd in the main branch is 96%.

Show a line coverage summary of the most impacted files.
File main 63002cd nemopatch/deep-agent... b32ea9e +/-
nemoclaw/src/onboard/config.ts 98% 96% -2%
nemoclaw/src/index.ts 94% 93% -1%
nemoclaw/src/bl...print/runner.ts 95% 95% 0%
nemoclaw/src/bl...ime-identity.ts 97% 97% 0%
nemoclaw/src/bl...t-management.ts 100% 100% 0%
nemoclaw/src/co.../config-show.ts 100% 100% 0%
nemoclaw/src/commands/slash.ts 100% 100% 0%
nemoclaw/src/on...native-route.ts 0% 100% +100%

TypeScript / code-coverage/cli

The overall line coverage in commit b32ea9e in the nemopatch/deep-agent... branch is 86%. The line coverage in commit 63002cd in the main branch is 84%.

Show a line coverage summary of the most impacted files.
File main 63002cd nemopatch/deep-agent... b32ea9e +/-
src/lib/onboard.ts 62% 46% -16%
src/lib/onboard...rchestration.ts 41% 32% -9%
src/lib/state/sandbox.ts 92% 84% -8%
src/lib/actions...ess-recovery.ts 65% 78% +13%
src/lib/inferen...file/cleanup.ts 73% 88% +15%
src/lib/state/l...diness-lease.ts 66% 82% +16%
src/lib/inferen...ollama/proxy.ts 41% 61% +20%
src/lib/onboard.../application.ts 55% 84% +29%
src/lib/inferen...nvidia/index.ts 0% 85% +85%
src/lib/onboard...ternal-image.ts 0% 91% +91%

Updated October 10, 2026 05:14 UTC

@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai review

@prekshivyas
prekshivyas marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2026 02:25
@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai review

@prekshivyas
prekshivyas marked this pull request as draft September 29, 2026 05:56
@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
⚠️ Action not completed

Review skipped.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Signed-off-by: Prekshi Vyas <prekshiv@nvidia.com>
@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
⚠️ Action not completed

Review skipped.

@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
⚠️ Action not completed

Review skipped.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
⚠️ Action not completed

Review skipped.

@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
⚠️ Action not completed

Review skipped.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Signed-off-by: Prekshi Vyas <prekshiv@nvidia.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
⚠️ Action not completed

Review skipped.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai help

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

CodeRabbit commands

These commands are invoked using PR/Issue comments.

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai review --preview-config to test the unmerged CodeRabbit configuration on a draft PR. The requester must have repository write access; preview results are non-authoritative.
  • @coderabbitai rate limit to show your current review rate limit status.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai track in a human-authored review thread to track the original finding until CodeRabbit verifies it is fixed.
  • @coderabbitai fixed in a tracked review thread to verify the current code against the original finding.
  • @coderabbitai evaluate custom pre-merge check --instructions <custom-checks-instructions> --name <custom-checks-title> [--mode <error|warning>] to validate the custom pre-merge checks instructions. Defaults to error when --mode is omitted.
  • @coderabbitai ignore pre-merge checks to override pre-merge checks and get an approval on PR.
  • @coderabbitai run pre-merge checks to run pre-merge checks on the pull request.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai emit path instructions to emit generated path-specific review instructions for this repository.
  • @coderabbitai generate project vocabulary to list vocabulary that is specific to this repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve merge conflict to automatically resolve merge conflicts.
  • @coderabbitai autofix to automatically fix issues in the current review thread, or all unresolved review comments when used in the PR conversation.
  • @coderabbitai autopilot to enable Autopilot to fix CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolve merge conflicts.
  • @coderabbitai autopilot resume to resume Autopilot for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai autopilot stop to stop Autopilot for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai fix-ci to automatically fix failing CI checks in a stacked pull request.
  • @coderabbitai fix-ci commit to automatically fix failing CI checks by committing fixes to the current branch.
  • @coderabbitai resolve to resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai generate configuration to create a PR that adds the current resolved configuration as .coderabbit.yaml (or show it if already present).
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, support, documentation and community

  • Visit our status page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
  • Visit our documentation site for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord community to connect with other users and get help from the community.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai pause

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
✅ Action performed

Reviews paused.

@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
⚠️ Action not completed

Review skipped.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@prekshivyas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@coderabbitai full review

prekshivyas and others added 4 commits October 7, 2026 20:07
Signed-off-by: Prekshi Vyas <prekshiv@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Prekshi Vyas <prekshiv@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Prekshi Vyas <prekshiv@nvidia.com>
prekshivyas added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2026
…2847)

## Outcome

PR E2E uses the upgrade commit's reviewed dependency inputs instead of
forcing main's versions. This change consolidates #12848's Deep Agents
controller fix and extends candidate selection through protected CPU/GPU
image builds and the OpenShell host runtime.

The acceptance target is at most two PRs for upgrades to existing
supported dependencies: normally one upgrade PR, plus one
trust/bootstrap prerequisite when necessary. Ordinary version bumps must
not need a third workflow-fix PR.

## Reason

OpenShell #12603 needs candidate runtime qualification, and Deep Agents
#12376 needs its candidate base in the protected controller. Selecting
candidate artifacts only in ordinary jobs leaves protected consumers on
main's dependencies. Pi also needs to publish source before it can
attach the resulting qualification receipts.

## Changes

- Resolve a reviewed OpenShell release from fixed files at the candidate
commit. Run this resolver only for its selected gateway consumers.
Candidate source remains inert input to pin and operational-template
verification.
- Derive image prerequisites from the existing workflow dependency
graph. Gateway-only and native-producer selections do not wait for
unused image publication. Image consumers and full release qualification
retain their gates.
- Reuse the existing candidate image path for OpenClaw, Hermes, Deep
Agents, Pi, OpenShell and shared npm inputs. Published base reuse now
checks Dockerfiles, parser inputs, ignore rules and copied files for all
three managed agents.
- Build candidate OpenClaw, Hermes and Deep Agents bases on native CPU
runners. Export each as OCI content with its agent, source, workflow,
platform and run identity. Protected GPU consumers verify those bytes
and identities before offline use; they reject published-base
substitution for PR runs.
- Project only reviewed OpenShell modules and release literals into the
trusted GPU controller. Select the reviewed candidate SDK archive,
retain the trusted dependency graph, then build and verify the CLI.
Restore the seven projected source files after qualification. These
steps reuse existing pin, archive and dependency-resolution controls
because arbitrary candidate host code cannot run with protected
credentials.
- Reuse main's Pi `--publication` check for local source publication,
including later repairs in the same PR. The same PR then adds both
published receipts and matching authority. CI remains strict; partial
refreshes and source drift fail.
- Retain verified-byte receipt parsing, staging Launchable opt-in,
failure propagation, resource cleanup and full-release gates. Update the
owning E2E guidance.
- Refresh both Pi qualification receipts from the successful candidate
image publication. Correct the managed-base fixture's platform and
image-label inputs. Validate and read protected files through the same
descriptor, with symlink and hardlink rejection tests. Add fixed,
non-secret approval-selector failure categories without changing its
acceptance rules.

## Verification

Current commit: `da4ce1d219e538cab23cb519aa65e90fda55c8e7`; base:
`6a02aac7f0053978a20eaed73159386e0ad2aff9`.

- [Core CI](https://github.com/NVIDIA/NemoClaw/actions/runs/37865126626)
passed, including all twelve CLI shards, coverage, static checks and the
final gate. [Security
scanning](https://github.com/NVIDIA/NemoClaw/actions/runs/37865126621)
passed.
- [Managed-image publication and
activation](https://github.com/NVIDIA/NemoClaw/actions/runs/37865126620)
passed. Both native Pi producers and all three managed-agent producers
succeeded. Docker and Podman artifacts bind the current commit and image
digests. Each reports 28 controlled-inference turns, zero activation
builds and 13 successful cleanup callbacks.
- [Self-hosted GPU
qualification](https://github.com/NVIDIA/NemoClaw/actions/runs/37865127484)
passed on attempt 2. The initial selector timed out before managed
publication completed; one affected-job rerun after publication
succeeded passed selection and the live test. Verified evidence binds
`da4ce1d`, records full GPU offload, an authenticated real OpenClaw
agent turn, public runtime destruction and provider resources already
absent. All three cleanup callbacks passed.
- [Focused manual
qualification](https://github.com/NVIDIA/NemoClaw/actions/runs/37869966568)
passed from trusted main, including Relevant E2E. All five selected jobs
passed: cloud onboarding, full OpenClaw E2E, Hermes E2E, and
OpenClaw/Hermes security posture. Verified artifacts bind the current PR
commit, workflow and dispatch correlation; each reports one passed test
with no failures, skips or errors. All recorded cleanup callbacks
passed. These tests do not establish candidate OpenShell 0.1.2 coverage.
Jetson, DGX Spark queue and staging Launchable opt-ins were false; full
Release qualification was not selected.
- Focused local validation of the expanded repair passed 13 files / 571
distinct tests. Projection tests cover immutable commits, reviewed
templates, SDK integrity, dependency metadata, tampering, filesystem
redirection, rollback and restoration. Executable SDK fixtures exercise
installation/import without lifecycle scripts or package credentials.
- Image handoff tests cover three agents and both native platforms. They
reject wrong-agent, source, workflow, run, platform and digest evidence.
Dependency-input regressions select candidate artifacts without workflow
edits and reject fallback to main after failed candidate publication.
- OpenShell #12603 package and lock inputs at
`f473315ca9b64cab56305f3bf4a15a877f0904b2` select reviewed SDK `0.1.2`
through the pure projector. This is not live SDK/runtime qualification.
- All four Pi checker/runner conflicts are resolved; those files match
the recorded main commit. The isolated checker/runner suite passed 57
tests. Normal commit hooks, isolated pre-push publication validation and
CLI TypeScript passed. All six PR commits are GitHub Verified.
- Local broad coverage could not finish under the approved macOS
isolation. The current Linux CI coverage result above supplies the
completed broad gate; no local broad-check pass or waiver is claimed.
- The diff contains no secrets, API keys or credentials.

## Review notes

Sensitive paths include `.github/workflows/e2e.yaml`, changed
`scripts/**`, `tools/e2e/**` and
`tools/pr-review-advisor/REVIEW-QUEUE.md`. Source self-review covers
candidate admission, protected execution, prerequisite propagation,
OCI/SDK verification and cleanup.

The [actual Advisor
run](https://github.com/NVIDIA/NemoClaw/actions/runs/37866718854)
reviewed current commit `da4ce1d` against base `6a02aac7`. All nine
specialists completed with no findings. Their artifacts and published
review were read. The deterministic E2E floor remains required; clear
reviews do not waive it.

[CodeRabbit's actual
review](#12847 (comment))
covers the final repair from `2cde38759` to `da4ce1d` and reports no
actionable comments. All three recorded review threads are resolved.
Earlier parity, receipt, fixture, pathname-race and diagnostic findings
were repaired; current core CI and security scanning passed afterward.

All reported PR checks and the focused manual E2E run are green on
`da4ce1d`. GitHub reports no merge conflicts, but human review remains
required. The protected qualification boundary below remains unresolved;
no automated review grants human approval or merge authority.

### Remaining qualification boundary

Current trusted main accepts only the v1 protected activation contract;
this PR introduces the v2 controller needed by candidate builds. Running
that known-rejected protected path before adoption would not qualify it.
Live protected candidate OpenShell/SDK projection therefore still needs
the adopted trusted controller, followed by testing the existing upgrade
PR. No third workflow PR should be needed for that supported path.

The completed Docker/Podman tests do not establish OpenShell 0.1.2
coverage or every dependency combination. Both current native Pi
publications and strict CI passed; Pi source publication and receipt
attachment remain within this PR. New release trust, SDK dependency
graphs, permissions or controller protocols may require the one allowed
trust/bootstrap prerequisite.

This PR does not claim full release qualification, waive missing
evidence, resolve the separate inference epic, or authorize merge.

---
Signed-off-by: Prekshi Vyas <prekshiv@nvidia.com>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Reliability**
* E2E checks can skip managed-image publication when selected checks
don’t require those images, while still enforcing publication for
dependent checks.
* Protected runtime checks verify candidate image artifacts and use
reviewed OpenShell sources and SDK versions.
* Admin approval selection errors now produce specific diagnostics
without exposing sensitive details.
* **Compatibility**
* OpenShell gateway checks resolve the version from the selected
candidate rather than relying on a fixed version.
* **Documentation**
* Added guidance on managed-image handling, E2E prerequisites, and
protected runtime checks.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Comment on lines +117 to +119
const script = livePlaceholderProbeScript()
.replace("/sandbox/.hermes/.env", fixture)
.replace('glob.glob("/proc/[0-9]*/environ")', "[]");
Comment on lines +117 to +119
const script = livePlaceholderProbeScript()
.replace("/sandbox/.hermes/.env", fixture)
.replace('glob.glob("/proc/[0-9]*/environ")', "[]");
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Review Advisor finished for commit b32ea9e. Include the Advisor findings in the complete PR feedback collection. Verify and group valid findings before repair.

Request review only when Require no Advisor blockers is green.

All previous runs

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area: packaging Packages, images, registries, installers, or distribution area: security Security controls, permissions, secrets, or hardening integration: dcode LangChain Deep Code integration behavior needs: unblock Blocked item needs dependency or decision resolved platform: container Affects Docker, containerd, Podman, or images platform: linux Affects non-Ubuntu Linux environments

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants