-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
fix: delegate persistence doctor backend detection to canonical resolver #4524
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Catch only resolver validation errors.
The outer store-test handlers already catch unexpected exceptions. This broad handler also hides import failures and resolver bugs, then selects
sqlite,qdrant, ormemoryas if the URL were unknown. The doctor can probe the wrong backend and report a misleading result. Remove this handler and keep the documentedValueErrorfallback.Proposed fix
except ValueError: return default - except Exception: - return default🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.16.2)
[warning] 578-578: Do not catch blind exception:
Exception(BLE001)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Source: Linters/SAST tools
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed against current head
924e1fd: the broad handler masks resolver/runtime defects, while the outer store-test path already owns unexpected-error reporting. I reproduced this with aRuntimeErrorregression (it was swallowed before the change) and verified the minimal fix—remove onlyexcept Exception, retain the documentedValueErrorfallback—with 53 focused tests passing. I have read-only access to this PR head, so a branch writer will need to apply the equivalent two-line removal before merge.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dajiaohuang, thank you for the validation. The finding remains valid until a branch writer removesexcept Exception. Keeping only theValueErrorfallback lets the outer store-test handlers report import failures and resolver defects correctly.You are interacting with an AI system.