Skip to content

merge queue: embarking main (a4ccdc8), #348, #337 and #344 together#377

Draft
mergify[bot] wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/e0e3b0e139
Draft

merge queue: embarking main (a4ccdc8), #348, #337 and #344 together#377
mergify[bot] wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/e0e3b0e139

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mergify mergify Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

⏳ The pull request #344 is embarked for merge and currently being checked. ⏳

Branch main (a4ccdc8), #348, #337 and #344 are embarked together for merge.

This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of #344.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue rule Python Dependency Updates for merge:

  • check-success = Test Image / API Test
  • any of [🛡 GitHub repository ruleset rule main]:
    • check-neutral = Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-skipped = Mergify Merge Protections
    • check-success = Mergify Merge Protections

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
checking_base_sha: cb26379a1eb57ab309e6938e1e0253706b7db11a
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 344
    scopes: []
scopes: []
...

@warestack
Copy link
Copy Markdown

warestack Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

🛡️ Warestack Governance Checks

No governance rules are configured for this repository yet.

Warestack lets your team define, enforce, and audit engineering standards directly on GitHub Pull Requests — without leaving your workflow.

Get started in 2 minutes:

  1. Claim your Warestack profile to activate governance for MH0386/MH0386.github.io
  2. Configure rules for PR quality, CI requirements, commit conventions, and more
  3. Receive automated feedback on every PR

This message will disappear once your installation is linked to a Warestack account. It will not be posted again on future PRs once you've claimed your profile.

@deepsource-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

deepsource-io Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

DeepSource Code Review

We reviewed changes in a4ccdc8...371d6f8 on this pull request. Below is the summary for the review, and you can see the individual issues we found as inline review comments.

See full review on DeepSource ↗

PR Report Card

Overall Grade   Security  

Reliability  

Complexity  

Hygiene  

Code Review Summary

Analyzer Status Updated (UTC) Details
Python Apr 16, 2026 11:34p.m. Review ↗
Secrets Apr 16, 2026 11:34p.m. Review ↗

Important

AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Updates Python version compatibility and development tooling versions, with corresponding dependency lockfile adjustments for the Renovate-managed dependency bump.

Flow diagram for updated Python and dev dependency constraints

flowchart TD
  A[Project_configuration_pyproject_toml] --> B[Runtime_requirement_requires_python_3_14_4_to_3_15]
  A --> C[Runtime_dependency_reflex_min_0_8_28_post1]
  A --> D[Dev_dependency_group_dev]
  D --> E[ruff_min_0_15_10]
  D --> F[ty_min_0_0_28]
  B --> G[Developer_environment_must_use_Python_3_14_4_or_newer_but_less_than_3_15]
  E --> H[Code_quality_checks_use_newer_ruff_version]
  C --> I[Application_runtime_depends_on_reflex]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Relaxed minimum supported Python patch version and bumped development linting dependency, updating the lockfile accordingly.
  • Raised the minimum required Python version from 3.14.3 to 3.14.4 while keeping the upper bound unchanged.
  • Increased the minimum ruff development dependency version from 0.15.9 to 0.15.10.
  • Regenerated the dependency lockfile to reflect the updated Python and ruff versions.
pyproject.toml
uv.lock

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants