Skip to content

Record R69 done in the phase table, README counts and diagram - #37

Merged
LucaCappelletti94 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/r69-docs-sync
Sep 19, 2026
Merged

LucaCappelletti94 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/r69-docs-sync

Conversation

@LucaCappelletti94

@LucaCappelletti94 LucaCappelletti94 commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

R69 landed through pull requests #28 to #31 and #34 to #35, and the completion commits carried the four status places but left the open-work table, the README counts and the architecture diagram describing the demos as still to come. This moves the R69 row into the done cluster with the strikethrough the finished rows carry, drops the needs-clause from R87 now that R69 pull request A has landed and rewrites its blocked-on paragraph to say the blocker is gone, and flips the diagram clause to the built green the other built clauses use. The README counts move to 64 done and 23 open and the remaining-work row pairs only R87 with storage quotas.

Summary by Sourcery

Record R69 as complete across the implementation plan, README, and architecture documentation.

Enhancements:

  • Mark R69 as completed and remove it from the remaining-work list, including clearing R87’s dependency on R69.
  • Update the documented project status to 64 completed phases and 23 open phases.

Documentation:

  • Update the architecture diagram to show the demo file routes as built.
  • Refresh the README and implementation plan to reflect R69 completion and the remaining R87 storage-quota work.

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry @LucaCappelletti94, you've used your own review budget of 250,000 diff characters for the last 7 days.

You can request another review in 2 days and 8 hours by commenting @sourcery-ai review. Upgrade to get a review now.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: LucaCappelletti94/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 6ae4e3e5-dba4-4c02-a855-fe257b318ff6


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-19T07:38:39.868816Z f4a1c0d PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Records R69 as complete across the phase plan, README, and architecture diagram, while removing its remaining-work entry and clearing R87’s former dependency on R69 pull request A.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Marked R69 as complete across the implementation plan and updated R87’s dependency status now that the required file-serving route has landed. plans/master-implementation-plan.md
Synchronized the README’s completion counts and remaining-work summary with the updated phase status.
  • Changed the totals to 64 done and 23 open.
  • Replaced the R69/R87 remaining-work entry with R87’s storage quotas and deployment ceilings.
README.md
Updated the architecture diagram’s R69 status wording to use the green built-state convention.
  • Flipped the diagram clause from outstanding work to built.
docs/architecture/architecture-diagram.svg

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f4a1c0de3b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

| done | ~~R66~~ | The connetto seam, on R65 |
| done | ~~R67~~ | The native file client, on R66 |
| done | ~~R68~~ | The browser file client, on R67 |
| done | ~~R69~~ | Files in every demo. Seven pull requests, G first, then A, B and C concurrently, then D and E, then F |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Update the authoritative R69 status before counting it done

Moving R69 into the done cluster and increasing the README's done count leaves the plan's authoritative Status table at line 252 reporting R69 as BUILT, even though this document explicitly distinguishes BUILT from DONE; the preamble also still lists R69 among the remaining demo gaps. Readers therefore receive three conflicting completion states, so the Status row and remaining-work summary should be reconciled with this transition.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.24%. Comparing base (d54b8dd) to head (f4a1c0d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #37      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.27%   83.24%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         114      114              
  Lines       25700    25700              
  Branches    25700    25700              
==========================================
- Hits        21402    21394       -8     
- Misses       3073     3079       +6     
- Partials     1225     1227       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
client 64.16% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
rest 56.01% <ø> (-0.39%) ⬇️
server 48.78% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@LucaCappelletti94
LucaCappelletti94 merged commit 13f4c1d into main Sep 19, 2026
99 of 101 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant