Record the R69 built state where status prose lives

[LucaCappelletti94]

The table row for R69 says IN PROGRESS since #31, but the section body at plans/master-implementation-plan.md:4736 still opened NOT STARTED and chapter 18 still claimed the demos phase was not built. The plan itself names table versus prose drift as its recurring failure, so this fixes the two prose spots in one small commit and changes no code. The R69 section now names #28 to #31 as built and D, E and F as open, and the chapter status line matches.

Summary by Sourcery

Bring the R69 status prose into alignment with the work completed and the remaining implementation plan.

Enhancements:

• Update R69 documentation to accurately record its in-progress state, completed work from pull requests Serve content files from the connetto-server executable #28–Run the file half in the browser stack and prove the photo flow end to end #31, and the remaining open demo and proof work.

Documentation:

• Synchronize the file-handling chapter and master implementation plan with the current R69 implementation status.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: LucaCappelletti94/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 19bb341f-1ea6-406e-87fc-b860538ea393

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[sourcery-ai]

Sorry @LucaCappelletti94, you've used your own review budget of 250,000 diff characters for the last 7 days.

You can request another review in 3 days and 18 hours by commenting @sourcery-ai review. Upgrade to get a review now.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-17T21:15:20.591895Z	6487295	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

This documentation-only change resolves the R69 table-versus-prose drift by recording the phase as in progress, attributing the built work to PRs #28–#31, and consistently listing the remaining demo validation work across the implementation plan and file-handling chapter.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Synchronize R69 status prose with the implementation state recorded in the plan table.	Mark the demos phase as in progress and record PRs Serve content files from the connetto-server executable #28–Run the file half in the browser stack and prove the photo flow end to end #31 as landed. Identify the remaining demo, offline, and second-viewer work as open, with F next. Retain the original design rationale and dependency details while updating the status narrative.	plans/master-implementation-plan.md
Update the file-handling chapter to describe the built portion of R69 and its remaining scope.	Record the executable half, schemas, protocols, and browser-stack wiring as built on 2026-09-17. Reference PRs Serve content files from the connetto-server executable #28–Run the file half in the browser stack and prove the photo flow end to end #31 and identify demo surfaces plus offline and two-viewer proofs as outstanding.	docs/architecture/18-file-handling.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.24%. Comparing base (85ef289) to head (6487295).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #32   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.24%   83.24%           
=======================================
  Files         114      114           
  Lines       25693    25693           
  Branches    25693    25693           
=======================================
+ Hits        21388    21389    +1     
+ Misses       3079     3078    -1     
  Partials     1226     1226           

Flag	Coverage Δ
client	64.16% <ø> (ø)
rest	55.98% <ø> (+0.15%)	⬆️
server	48.80% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.