Skip to content

automated: linux: kselftest: Don't skip the main rseq tests#625

Merged
bhcopeland merged 1 commit into
Linaro:masterfrom
broonie:no-skip-rseq
Apr 24, 2026
Merged

automated: linux: kselftest: Don't skip the main rseq tests#625
bhcopeland merged 1 commit into
Linaro:masterfrom
broonie:no-skip-rseq

Conversation

@broonie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@broonie broonie commented Apr 24, 2026

The rseq run_params_test.sh runner is currently skipped, according to
the changelog due to it being very slow (the comments in the file don't
agree but appear to be bitrotted). While it is slow it's the main test
here and does work, remove the skip since this is more a policy decision
for individual testers than something that's actively broken.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org

The rseq run_params_test.sh runner is currently skipped, according to
the changelog due to it being very slow (the comments in the file don't
agree but appear to be bitrotted).  While it is slow it's the main test
here and does work, remove the skip since this is more a policy decision
for individual testers than something that's actively broken.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
@bhcopeland
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Good spot @broonie. We need to probably re-think that skip list, as its very easy for it to end up in bit-rot state, and its easy for skips tests to make it back into service.

@bhcopeland bhcopeland merged commit f1dd0e7 into Linaro:master Apr 24, 2026
3 checks passed
@broonie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

broonie commented Apr 24, 2026

Yes, I was looking at the rest of the file and thinking it probably needed an audit (there's comments about v4.0 in there!).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants