[AI Agent Test] ply compatible fast read, mainly implementated in parse.py - #25
Merged
KenKundert merged 2 commits intoDec 12, 2025
Merged
Conversation
…y as same as before
Owner
|
Which version is preferred? |
Contributor
Author
|
Hi Ken, Thank you so much for your feedback. I prefer this latest version for several reasons:
The previous version felt more like a workaround that bypassed PLY’s lexer/parser. I would only recommend that approach if: I also added additional tests to improve coverage and to ensure all checks pass. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dear Ken:
This pull request is not for merge purpose but It's also clean to merge if you want. (Same x37 speed up and pass all 39 tox tests)

I am testing Gemini 3 Pro/Claude Sonnet 4.5 (in AntiGravity IDE) as AI Agent to write the code. This implementation has the same effect as the previous pull. The only difference is that the fast_read is implemented in tight coupling with parse.py, instead of the fast_read bypass ply approach. Hence the psf.py file is relatively clean.
I would like to use this as s transition study from Computer-Aided Design(CAD) to Human-Aided AI Design (HAAD) :p
I will probability close this pull request after 5 days without action
Regards,
Gaofeng