feat(review): capture per-reviewer AI votes with swap-proof attribution

src/queue/ai-review-orchestration.ts

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ import {
   type TransientLockClaim,
 } from "./transient-locks";
 import { buildPullRequestAdvisory } from "../rules/advisory";
-import { getDecryptedRepositoryAiKey, getRepository, listCheckSummaries, listPullRequestFiles } from "../db/repositories";
+import { recordAuditEvent, getDecryptedRepositoryAiKey, getRepository, listCheckSummaries, listPullRequestFiles } from "../db/repositories";
 import { createInstallationToken } from "../github/app";
 import type { AgentActionMode } from "../settings/agent-execution";
 import { buildAiReviewDiff } from "../review/review-diff";
@@ -721,6 +721,19 @@ export async function runAiReviewForAdvisory(
       improvementSignal: args.improvementSignal === true,
     });
     if (result.status !== "ok") return undefined;
+    // #8229 stage 0: persist each reviewer's stance for the provider track records — best-effort like every
+    // calibration write (a vote-store failure must never affect the review), one audit event per reviewer,
+    // attribution already swap-proof from the runner (votes attach at leg production time).
+    for (const vote of result.reviewerVotes) {
+      await recordAuditEvent(env, {
+        eventType: "reviewer_vote",
+        actor: vote.reviewer,
+        targetKey: `${args.repoFullName}#${args.pr.number}`,
+        outcome: "completed",
+        detail: vote.votedFail ? "flagged a blocking defect" : "did not flag a blocking defect",
+        metadata: { repoFullName: args.repoFullName, vote: vote.votedFail ? "fail" : "non_fail" },
+      }).catch(() => undefined);
+    }
     const findings: AdvisoryFinding[] = [];
     if (result.consensusDefect) {
       findings.push({

src/services/ai-review.ts

@@ -392,6 +392,11 @@ export type LoopOverAiReviewResult =
       inconclusive: boolean;
       estimatedNeurons: number;
       reviewerCount: number;
+      /** Per-reviewer stances for the provider track records (#8229 stage 0). Attribution attaches at leg
+       *  PRODUCTION time (a.review ↔ primary.model, b.review ↔ secondary.model), so the tie-break judge's
+       *  order-swap — which operates downstream on copies — can never misattribute a vote. Block-mode only
+       *  (the gate corpus is what the track records score against); empty in advisory-only runs. */
+      reviewerVotes: { reviewer: string; votedFail: boolean }[];
       inlineFindings: InlineFinding[];
       /** Combined improvement/value judgment (#4743), public-safe and ready to render. ALWAYS present (`null`
        *  when `input.improvementSignal` is falsy, when neither reviewer emitted a usable judgment, or when the
@@ -2338,6 +2343,7 @@ export async function runLoopOverAiReview(
   }
 
   let consensusDefect: AiConsensusDefect | null = null;
+  const reviewerVotes: { reviewer: string; votedFail: boolean }[] = [];
   let secondReview: ModelReview | null = null;
   let aiReviewSplit = false;
   let splitConfidence: number | undefined;
@@ -2375,6 +2381,9 @@ export async function runLoopOverAiReview(
       ]);
       if (a.fallbackNote) fallbackNotes.push(a.fallbackNote);
       if (b.fallbackNote) fallbackNotes.push(b.fallbackNote);
+      // #8229 stage 0: attach votes HERE, where slot↔model is unambiguous by construction.
+      if (a.review) reviewerVotes.push({ reviewer: primary.model, votedFail: a.review.blockers.length > 0 });
+      if (b.review) reviewerVotes.push({ reviewer: secondary.model, votedFail: b.review.blockers.length > 0 });
       secondReview = b.review;
       // Combine per the configured strategy (#dual-ai-combiner). Default `consensus` is byte-identical to the
       // historical logic: block only on agreement, lone blocker → split, a missing opinion → inconclusive
@@ -2435,6 +2444,8 @@ export async function runLoopOverAiReview(
           )
         : ({ review: advisoryReview } as ReviewerOpinionOutcome);
       if (a.fallbackNote) fallbackNotes.push(a.fallbackNote);
+      // #8229 stage 0: single-reviewer stance, attributed to the model that actually produced it.
+      if (a.review) reviewerVotes.push({ reviewer: primary.model, votedFail: a.review.blockers.length > 0 });
       const combined = combineReviews([a.review], { strategy: "single" });
       consensusDefect = combined.defect;
       inconclusive = combined.inconclusive;
@@ -2498,6 +2509,7 @@ export async function runLoopOverAiReview(
   return {
     status: "ok",
     advisoryNotes,
+    reviewerVotes,
     consensusDefect,
     split: aiReviewSplit,
     // Carry the split's calibrated confidence (#8) so the caller can apply the same `aiReviewCloseConfidence`

test/unit/ai-review.test.ts

@@ -1680,6 +1680,49 @@ describe("runLoopOverAiReview self-host dual-AI plan (#dual-ai-combiner)", () =>
     expect([...seen].sort()).toEqual(["claude-code", "codex"]);
   });
 
+  it("#8229 stage 0: reviewerVotes attribute each stance to the model that produced it — split case, both stances distinct", async () => {
+    const env = planEnv(
+      { reviewers: [{ model: "claude-code" }, { model: "codex" }], combine: "consensus" },
+      async (model) =>
+        model === "codex"
+          ? { response: reviewJson({ present: true, title: "Race condition in src/x.ts" }) }
+          : { response: reviewJson({ present: false }) },
+    );
+    const result = await runLoopOverAiReview(env, { ...baseInput, mode: "block" });
+    if (result.status !== "ok") throw new Error("expected ok");
+    // The tie-break judge re-runs order-swapped internally on disagreement — attribution must be immune
+    // to it because votes attach at leg production time, not slot interpretation.
+    const votes = [...result.reviewerVotes].sort((a, b) => a.reviewer.localeCompare(b.reviewer));
+    expect(votes).toEqual([
+      { reviewer: "claude-code", votedFail: false },
+      { reviewer: "codex", votedFail: true },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  it("#8229 stage 0: an unparseable leg casts NO vote — never a fabricated stance for its model", async () => {
+    const env = planEnv(
+      { reviewers: [{ model: "claude-code" }, { model: "codex" }], combine: "consensus" },
+      async (model) =>
+        model === "claude-code" ? { response: "not json at all" } : { response: reviewJson({ present: false }) },
+    );
+    const result = await runLoopOverAiReview(env, { ...baseInput, mode: "block" });
+    if (result.status !== "ok") throw new Error("expected ok");
+    expect(result.reviewerVotes).toEqual([{ reviewer: "codex", votedFail: false }]);
+  });
+
+  it("#8229 stage 0: advisory-only runs carry no votes (block-mode corpus only)", async () => {
+    const run = vi.fn(async () => ({ response: reviewJson() }));
+    const env = createTestEnv({
+      AI: { run } as unknown as Ai,
+      AI_SUMMARIES_ENABLED: "true",
+      AI_PUBLIC_COMMENTS_ENABLED: "true",
+      AI_DAILY_NEURON_BUDGET: "100000",
+    });
+    const result = await runLoopOverAiReview(env, baseInput);
+    if (result.status !== "ok") throw new Error("expected ok");
+    expect(result.reviewerVotes).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
   it("single + BYOK: the provider writes the advisory; the one decision reviewer runs via the router", async () => {
     vi.stubGlobal(
       "fetch",

test/unit/reviewer-vote-capture.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+import { describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
+import { runAiReviewForAdvisory } from "../../src/queue/processors";
+import * as repositories from "../../src/db/repositories";
+import { createTestEnv } from "../helpers/d1";
+import type { Advisory, RepositorySettings } from "../../src/types";
+
+// #8229 stage 0: the persistence half of reviewer-vote capture. The runner-side attribution invariants
+// (leg-production-time attachment, swap immunity, advisory-only emptiness) live in ai-review.test.ts;
+// this file pins that an ok block-mode review writes ONE reviewer_vote audit row per reviewer with the
+// provider identity as actor and the stance in metadata — and that a vote-store failure never touches
+// the review result (best-effort, like every calibration write).
+
+const REPO = "acme/widgets";
+
+function reviewJson(present: boolean): string {
+  return JSON.stringify({
+    assessment: present ? "Likely defect." : "Looks fine.",
+    blockers: present ? ["Race condition in src/x.ts: unguarded shared write."] : [],
+    nits: [],
+    suggestions: [],
+    confidence: present ? 0.96 : 0.7,
+  });
+}
+
+function advisory(number: number): Advisory {
+  return {
+    id: `adv-${number}`,
+    targetType: "pull_request",
+    targetKey: `${REPO}#${number}`,
+    repoFullName: REPO,
+    pullNumber: number,
+    headSha: `sha${number}`,
+    conclusion: "neutral",
+    severity: "info",
+    title: "LoopOver advisory available",
+    summary: "ok",
+    findings: [],
+    generatedAt: "2026-07-23T00:00:00.000Z",
+  };
+}
+
+function voteEnv(seen: string[]): Env {
+  return createTestEnv({
+    AI_SUMMARIES_ENABLED: "true",
+    AI_PUBLIC_COMMENTS_ENABLED: "true",
+    AI_DAILY_NEURON_BUDGET: "1000000",
+    AI: {
+      run: vi.fn(async (model: string) => {
+        if (!seen.includes(model)) seen.push(model);
+        // Second DISTINCT model flags; the first stays clean — a split with distinct stances.
+        return { response: reviewJson(seen.indexOf(model) === 1) };
+      }),
+    } as unknown as Ai,
+  });
+}
+
+describe("reviewer-vote capture persistence (#8229 stage 0)", () => {
+  it("persists one reviewer_vote audit row per reviewer: provider as actor, stance in metadata", async () => {
+    const seen: string[] = [];
+    const env = voteEnv(seen);
+    await runAiReviewForAdvisory(env, {
+      mode: "live",
+      settings: { aiReviewMode: "block" } as RepositorySettings,
+      repoFullName: REPO,
+      pr: { number: 7, title: "Add helper", body: "Adds a helper." },
+      author: "alice",
+      confirmedContributor: true,
+      advisory: advisory(7),
+    });
+
+    const rows = await env.DB.prepare("SELECT actor, metadata_json FROM audit_events WHERE event_type = 'reviewer_vote' AND target_key = ?")
+      .bind(`${REPO}#7`)
+      .all<{ actor: string; metadata_json: string }>();
+    const votes = (rows.results ?? [])
+      .map((row) => ({ actor: row.actor, vote: (JSON.parse(row.metadata_json) as { vote: string }).vote }))
+      .sort((a, b) => a.actor.localeCompare(b.actor));
+    expect(votes).toHaveLength(2);
+    // Exactly the two REVIEWER models (the disagreement tie-break judge may add later calls with other
+    // model ids — judges never vote), each with ITS OWN stance.
+    expect(new Set(votes.map((v) => v.actor))).toEqual(new Set(seen.slice(0, 2)));
+    const byActor = Object.fromEntries(votes.map((v) => [v.actor, v.vote]));
+    expect(byActor[seen[0]!]).toBe("non_fail");
+    expect(byActor[seen[1]!]).toBe("fail");
+  });
+
+  it("a rejecting vote write is swallowed: the review outcome is untouched (best-effort discipline)", async () => {
+    const seen: string[] = [];
+    const env = voteEnv(seen);
+    vi.spyOn(repositories, "recordAuditEvent").mockRejectedValue(new Error("vote store down"));
+    const result = await runAiReviewForAdvisory(env, {
+      mode: "live",
+      settings: { aiReviewMode: "block" } as RepositorySettings,
+      repoFullName: REPO,
+      pr: { number: 8, title: "Add helper", body: "Adds a helper." },
+      author: "alice",
+      confirmedContributor: true,
+      advisory: advisory(8),
+    });
+    expect(result).toBeDefined(); // the review completed despite every vote write rejecting
+    vi.restoreAllMocks();
+  });
+});