Conversation
|
Claude finished @ramilamparo's task in 4m 23s —— View job Review of PR #66: Improve README.md
The rewritten Description and new Example Workflows section are a clear improvement — concrete bash examples and structured use-case bullets make the tool much more approachable. Three inline comments posted on specific lines:
No security, performance, or test coverage concerns (documentation-only change). |
|
Claude finished @ramilamparo's task in 5m 48s —— View job Review of PR #66: Improve README.md
The rewritten Description and new Example Workflows section are a solid improvement. Two new inline comments posted (lines 46 and 58) on top of the three from the prior review:
No security, performance, or test coverage concerns. |
|
Claude finished @ramilamparo's task in 7m 27s —— View job Review of PR #66: Improve README.md
Three of five items from previous reviews are now fixed (SKILL.md link,
Resolved two outdated bot threads (SKILL.md link, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good progress — three of the five items from previous reviews are now fixed (SKILL.md link, --items usage, $(date) instead of {YYYY}). Two items remain:
--closed false(line 58) — re-raised inline; yargs boolean quirk means this filters for closed runs, not open onesstatusCounts(line 59) — existing thread still open; the field isn't in the typedRuninterface, so it's worth confirming it's present in the actual API response before documenting it
No security, performance, or test coverage concerns.
hi-rai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks okay. Unrelated, but I guess now we can also add a link to the CLI in our API docs
I created a separate issue for this. |
Highlights public API commands, and agentic workflows.