Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are currently being supported with security updates.
| Version | Supported |
|---|---|
| 5.1.x | ✅ |
| 5.0.x | ❌ |
| 4.0.x | ✅ |
| < 4.0 | ❌ |
Use this section to tell people how to report a vulnerability.
Tell them where to go, how often they can expect to get an update on a reported vulnerability, what to expect if the vulnerability is accepted or declined, etc.
This repository enforces modular CI configuration and audit-grade defensibility.
Recent fix: A critical YAML misconfiguration in .github/dependabot.yml was identified and resolved. Multiple top-level updates: blocks were merged into a single list to restore multi-ecosystem support (pip, GitHub Actions, etc.). This change ensures full CI coverage and prevents silent failures in dependency tracking.
All CI configurations are now linted, deterministic, and version-controlled.
The Krunixbase ecosystem incorporates AI‑assisted components strictly within a controlled, auditable, and security‑aligned framework. AI/LLM functionality is designed to support cryptographic analysis, compliance workflows, and documentation generation without introducing new attack surfaces or weakening cryptographic guarantees.
Isolation and Trust Boundaries
-
AI components operate in a sandboxed environment fully isolated from cryptographic primitives, secret‑handling logic, and threshold reconstruction workflows.
-
No secret material, key fragments, or sensitive cryptographic artifacts are ever exposed to AI systems.
-
LLMs do not participate in cryptographic decision‑making and cannot override deterministic validation results.
Deterministic and Auditable Workflows
-
All LLM interactions follow fixed, versioned, and reproducible prompt templates.
-
Outputs are deterministic within the constraints of the model and are validated against cryptographic truth before being accepted into any workflow.
-
Every AI‑assisted operation generates a traceable audit log entry aligned with the repository’s security and compliance model.
Data Handling and Privacy Guarantees
-
No user data, evidence, or cryptographic material is used for model training.
-
All inference is stateless and ephemeral.
-
AI components process only metadata, structural information, and non‑sensitive representations of evidence.
Operational Constraints
-
AI systems serve as analytical and documentation‑support components, not autonomous decision engines.
-
AI‑generated outputs are advisory and must pass deterministic validation layers before integration into forensic or compliance artifacts.
-
The system enforces strict separation between AI‑assisted analysis and authoritative cryptographic verification.
Risk Mitigation
-
AI components cannot modify evidence, cryptographic artifacts, or validation results.
-
All outputs are subject to human or deterministic review in workflows requiring audit‑grade assurance.
-
The architecture prevents model hallucinations from influencing cryptographic or compliance outcomes.