Add a LICENSE (Apache-2.0 proposed) - #1
Open
RomanZhulpo wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
The repository currently ships no LICENSE, which under default copyright law means all rights reserved: nobody can legally run, copy or adapt it, however public it is. That is almost certainly not the intent for something published as a reference deployment. Apache-2.0 is proposed rather than MIT because it carries an explicit patent grant. That is the difference that matters if the recipe is ever adopted inside a regulated company — legal review asks for it by name, and its absence is a blocker that MIT cannot answer. It is also what comparable projects in this space use (Graphiti, for one). Swap it for MIT or anything else if you prefer; the point of the PR is that *some* licence exists, not that it is this one. Only you can license the work, so merging this is the licensing act — I am only providing the file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The repo ships no
LICENSE, so by default copyright law it is all rights reserved — public, but not legally usable, adaptable or deployable by anyone else. I doubt that is the intent for something published as a reference deployment.Why Apache-2.0 rather than MIT: the explicit patent grant. That is the clause legal review asks for by name once a recipe is adopted inside a regulated company, and MIT has no answer to it. Graphiti and most of the comparable memory/vault projects landed on Apache-2.0 for the same reason.
That said — the licence choice is yours, and only you can make it: merging this PR is the licensing act, I am just supplying the file. Swap it for MIT or anything else and I will happily close this.
No other changes; the link-health suggestion is in a separate PR so you can take them independently.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_013w4fJ5QnvragpvHHgH2JFS