Bugfix related to checks for TwoLevelTree and StrategicStochasticProfile

NEWS.md

@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
 # Release notes
 
+## Version 0.10.2 (2026-06-09)
+
+### Bug fixes
+
+* Fixed a bug for using `StrategicProfile` in the field `opex_fixed` of a node and `TwoLevelTree` as time structure.
+* Fixed a bug for using `StrategicProfile` in the field `emission_limit` of a modeltype and `TwoLevelTree` as time structure.
+* Fixed bug in function `check_strategic_profile` when utilizing  `StrategicStochasticProfile`.
+
 ## Version 0.10.1 (2026-04-14)
 
 ### Minor updates

Project.toml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 name = "EnergyModelsBase"
 uuid = "5d7e687e-f956-46f3-9045-6f5a5fd49f50"
 authors = ["Lars Hellemo <Lars.Hellemo@sintef.no>, Julian Straus <Julian.Straus@sintef.no>"]
-version = "0.10.1"
+version = "0.10.2"
 
 [deps]
 JuMP = "4076af6c-e467-56ae-b986-b466b2749572"

src/checks.jl

@@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ Checks the `modeltype` .
 """
 function check_model(case, modeltype::EnergyModel, check_timeprofiles::Bool)
     𝒯 = get_time_struct(case)
-    𝒯ᴵⁿᵛ = strategic_periods(𝒯)
 
     # Check for inclusion of all emission resources
     for p ∈ get_products(case)
@@ -310,27 +309,21 @@ function check_model(case, modeltype::EnergyModel, check_timeprofiles::Bool)
     end
 
     for p ∈ keys(emission_limit(modeltype))
-        em_limit = emission_limit(modeltype, p)
-        # Check for the strategic periods
-        if isa(em_limit, StrategicProfile) && check_timeprofiles
-            @assert_or_log(
-                length(em_limit.vals) == length(𝒯ᴵⁿᵛ),
-                "The timeprofile provided for resource `" *
-                string(p) *
-                "` in the field " *
-                "`emission_limit` does not match the strategic structure."
-            )
-        end
-
         # Check for potential indexing problems
+        em_limit = emission_limit(modeltype, p)
         message =
             "are not allowed for the resource `" *
             string(p) *
             "` in the dictionary " *
             "`emission_limit`."
         check_strategic_profile(em_limit, message)
+
+        # Check for the strategic periods
+        check_timeprofiles || continue
+        check_profile("emission_limit[" * string(p) * "]", em_limit, 𝒯)
     end
 
+    # Check for the strategic periods
     for p ∈ keys(emission_price(modeltype))
         em_price = emission_price(modeltype, p)
         check_timeprofiles || continue
@@ -662,6 +655,13 @@ function check_strategic_profile(time_profile::TimeProfile, message::String)
         for l1_profile ∈ time_profile.vals
             sub_msg = "in strategic profiles " * message
             bool_sp = check_strat_sub_profile(l1_profile, sub_msg, bool_sp)
+            !bool_sp && break
+        end
+    elseif isa(time_profile, StrategicStochasticProfile)
+        for sp_array ∈ time_profile.vals, l1_profile ∈ sp_array
+            sub_msg = "in strategic stochastic profiles " * message
+            bool_sp = check_strat_sub_profile(l1_profile, sub_msg, bool_sp)
+            !bool_sp && break
         end
     end
 
@@ -1017,14 +1017,6 @@ returns a `TimeProfile`.
   periods.
 """
 function check_fixed_opex(n, 𝒯ᴵⁿᵛ, check_timeprofiles::Bool)
-    if isa(opex_fixed(n), StrategicProfile) && check_timeprofiles
-        @assert_or_log(
-            length(opex_fixed(n).vals) == length(𝒯ᴵⁿᵛ),
-            "The timeprofile provided for the field `opex_fixed` does not match the " *
-            "strategic structure."
-        )
-    end
-
     # Check for potential indexing problems
     message = "are not allowed for the field `opex_fixed`."
     bool_sp = check_strategic_profile(opex_fixed(n), message)

test/test_checks.jl

@@ -462,6 +462,9 @@ end
         StrategicProfile([OperationalProfile([5])]),
         StrategicProfile([ScenarioProfile([5])]),
         StrategicProfile([RepresentativeProfile([5])]),
+        StrategicStochasticProfile([[OperationalProfile([5])]]),
+        StrategicStochasticProfile([[ScenarioProfile([5])]]),
+        StrategicStochasticProfile([[RepresentativeProfile([5])]]),
     ]
     for tp ∈ profiles
         @test_throws AssertionError EMB.check_strategic_profile(tp, "")
@@ -514,26 +517,24 @@ end
 end
 
 @testset "Checks - Nodes" begin
-
     # Resources used in the checks
     NG = ResourceEmit("NG", 0.2)
     Power = ResourceCarrier("Power", 0.0)
     CO2 = ResourceEmit("CO2", 1.0)
     aux = ResourceCarrier("aux", 0.0)
 
     # Function for setting up the system for testing `Sink` and `Source`
-    function simple_graph(;
+    function check_graph_src_snk(;
         src_cap::TimeProfile = FixedProfile(10),
         src_opex_var::TimeProfile = FixedProfile(10),
         src_opex_fixed::TimeProfile = FixedProfile(0),
         src_output::Dict = Dict(Power => 1),
         snk_cap::TimeProfile = OperationalProfile([6, 8, 10, 6, 8]),
         snk_pen::Dict = Dict(:surplus => FixedProfile(4), :deficit => FixedProfile(10)),
         snk_input::Dict = Dict(Power => 1),
+        T = TwoLevel(2, 2, SimpleTimes(5, 2); op_per_strat = 10),
     )
         resources = [Power, CO2]
-        ops = SimpleTimes(5, 2)
-        T = TwoLevel(2, 2, ops; op_per_strat = 10)
 
         source =
         RefSource(
@@ -566,39 +567,55 @@ end
         # Sink used in the analysis
         # Test that a wrong capacity is caught by the checks.
         src_cap = FixedProfile(-4)
-        @test_throws AssertionError simple_graph(;src_cap)
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(;src_cap)
 
         # Test that a wrong output dictionary is caught by the checks.
         src_output = Dict(Power => -1)
-        @test_throws AssertionError simple_graph(;src_output)
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(;src_output)
 
         # Test that a wrong fixed OPEX is caught by the checks.
         src_opex_fixed = FixedProfile(-5)
-        @test_throws AssertionError simple_graph(;src_opex_fixed)
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(; src_opex_fixed)
 
-        # Test that a wrong profile for fixed OPEX is caught by the checks.
+        # Test that a wrong profile for fixed OPEX is caught by the checks both with a
+        # `TwoLevelTree` and `TwoLevel` time structure
         # - check_fixed_opex(n::Node, 𝒯ᴵⁿᵛ, check_timeprofiles::Bool)
         src_opex_fixed = StrategicProfile([1])
-        @test_throws AssertionError simple_graph(;src_opex_fixed)
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(; src_opex_fixed)
         src_opex_fixed = OperationalProfile([1])
-        @test_throws AssertionError simple_graph(;src_opex_fixed)
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(; src_opex_fixed)
+        src_opex_fixed = StrategicProfile([OperationalProfile([1]), OperationalProfile([1])])
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(; src_opex_fixed)
+
+        T = TwoLevelTree(2, [2], SimpleTimes(5, 1); op_per_strat = 10.)
+        src_opex_fixed = StrategicProfile([1])
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(; src_opex_fixed, T)
+        src_opex_fixed = StrategicProfile([1, 2, 3])
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(; src_opex_fixed, T)
+        src_opex_fixed = OperationalProfile([1])
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(; src_opex_fixed, T)
+        src_opex_fixed = StrategicStochasticProfile([
+            [OperationalProfile([1])],
+            [OperationalProfile([1]), OperationalProfile([1])],
+        ])
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(; src_opex_fixed, T)
     end
 
     # Test that the fields of a Sink are correctly checked
     # - check_node(n::Sink, 𝒯, modeltype::EnergyModel)
     @testset "Sink" begin
         # Test that an inconsistent Sink.penalty dictionaries is caught by the checks.
         snk_pen = Dict(:surplus => FixedProfile(4), :def => FixedProfile(2))
-        @test_throws AssertionError simple_graph(;snk_pen)
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(;snk_pen)
 
         # The penalties in this Sink node lead to an infeasible optimum. Test that the
         # checks forbids it.
         snk_pen = Dict(:surplus => FixedProfile(-4), :deficit => FixedProfile(2))
-        @test_throws AssertionError simple_graph(;snk_pen)
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(;snk_pen)
 
         # Check that a wrong capacity in a sink is caught by the checks.
         snk_cap = OperationalProfile(-[6, 8, 10, 6, 8])
-        @test_throws AssertionError simple_graph(;snk_cap)
+        @test_throws AssertionError check_graph_src_snk(;snk_cap)
     end
 
     # Function for setting up the system for testing a `NetworkNode`

test/test_investments.jl

@@ -227,8 +227,9 @@ using EnergyModelsInvestments
     # Test results
     # (-724 compared to 0.5.x as RefStorage as emission source does not require a charge
     #  capacity any longer in 0.7.x)
-    # (-10736 compared to 0.9.x due to the potential of early retirment)
-    @test round(objective_value(m)) ≈ -313360.0
+    # (-10736 compared to 0.9.x due to the potential of early retirement)
+    # (-16689 compared to 10.1.x due to the bugfix 0.9.1 in EMI)
+    @test round(objective_value(m)) ≈ -296671.0
 
     # Test that investments are happening
     𝒯ᴵⁿᵛ = strategic_periods(get_time_struct(case))
@@ -247,7 +248,6 @@ using EnergyModelsInvestments
     @test sum(
         sum(value.(m[:stor_charge_add][n, t_inv]) > 0 for n ∈ 𝒩ᶜʰᵃʳᵍᵉ)
         for t_inv ∈ 𝒯ᴵⁿᵛ) > 0
-
 end
 
 @testset "Link - OPEX and investments" begin