Add FORCE to the algorithm catalog

[Hneuschmidt]

This PR introduces FORCE as an algorithm to the APEx algorithm catalogue.
The source for the FORCE EO Application package is contained in the apex-force-openeo repository

Important

Integration work on FORCE is still ongoing so details may change

It is still early to make FORCE fully available. However, I would like to start the process of integrating the record to make sure we have all metadata ready by the time the integration work is done.

@JanssenBrm David Frantz (author and maintainer of FORCE) and I were wondering who to mention as the "algorithm provider" in this case. Unlike (all?) the other examples in the APEx algorithm catalogue, this software is provided by a researcher at a university with no involvement by a company. We could add e.g. the university, the group or David as a person as the algorithm provider. Do we have a policy for these cases?

A few thoughts to consider:

• As I understand, David owns the IP
• University / Group association may change in the future, the IP moves with the owner

[algorithm-services-catalogue]

🔍 Catalogue's Preview Site Deployed

Your changes have been deployed to the preview site:

🔗 Preview URL: https://esa-apex.github.io/apex-algorithms-catalogue-web/pr-preview/pr-501/

This preview will be updated automatically when you push new changes to your PR.

[JanssenBrm]

@JanssenBrm David Frantz (author and maintainer of FORCE) and I were wondering who to mention as the "algorithm provider" in this case. Unlike (all?) the other examples in the APEx algorithm catalogue, this software is provided by a researcher at a university with no involvement by a company. We could add e.g. the university, the group or David as a person as the algorithm provider. Do we have a policy for these cases?

There are currently no policies in place for this. The role field is also a free-text field and you can add multiple contacts. I suggest to add David Frantz with the roles author and maintainer. If David also wants to mention the university or group this is also fine.