Expose the tautological answer in Erdős 633 - #269
Draft
DomTheDeveloper wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
|
👋 This is an automated welcome message. 🤖 A few friendly reminders while the review gets started:
Thanks again for helping improve Formal Conjectures. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Result
The literal declaration asks for a set of triangles characterized by
With no restriction on the set-valued answer, choose the set comprehension of that property itself. The theorem then reduces to reflexivity.
Verification
Focused audit run
30209696453passed every gate:sorryAxor compiler-trust dependency.Qualification
This is a specification defect, not a classification of the triangles in simpler geometric terms.
This remains a draft pending canonical statement repair.