Similar Findings: Restrict to Product Scope#13271
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: valentijnscholten <valentijnscholten@gmail.com>
valentijnscholten
approved these changes
Sep 29, 2025
Jino-T
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2025
blakeaowens
approved these changes
Oct 2, 2025
Maffooch
commented
Oct 2, 2025
Maffooch
added a commit
to valentijnscholten/django-DefectDojo
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2026
* Similar Findings: Restrict to Product Scope * fix data tables oops * Update dojo/templates/dojo/view_finding.html Co-authored-by: valentijnscholten <valentijnscholten@gmail.com> * Update dojo/templates/dojo/view_finding.html --------- Co-authored-by: valentijnscholten <valentijnscholten@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The similar finding table allows for manually setting duplicates of findings that deduplication did not fully catch. This is a neat feature, but it also allowed for findings to be a duplicate of a finding from a different product entirely. This not something a naturally occurring circumstance in deduplication, so we should not allow it in similar findings either