[python] skip test for APPSEC-61861

[avara1986]

Motivation

Related to the same unvalidated redirect flaky test https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APPSEC-61861

Changes

Workflow

1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
2. Work on you PR until the CI passes
3. Mark it as ready for review
   • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner.
   • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

• Anything but tests/ or manifests/ is modified ? I have the approval from R&P team
• A docker base image is modified?
  • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
• A scenario is added, removed or renamed?
  • Get a review from R&P team

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

manifests/python.yml                                                    @DataDog/apm-python @DataDog/asm-python

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 63972bd570

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Preserve the pre-release missing-feature range

This wildcard flaky declaration applies to every Python version for every weblog. The previous v4.12.0-rc1 manifest entry was interpreted as missing_feature for versions below 4.12.0-rc1, so older tracer releases that do not implement this extended-location test are now reported/skipped as APPSEC-61861 flakes instead of missing features. Please keep a version-bounded missing-feature entry for the pre-implementation range, or bound the flaky marker to only the affected implemented versions.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.