[CWS] Add declared hardening infos by mftoure · Pull Request #55994 · DataDog/datadog-agent

mftoure · 2026-09-08T13:34:36Z

What

Enrich CWS security profiles with the declared Kubernetes hardening posture (privileged, seccomp profile, capabilities add/drop, bools: runAsNonRoot, allowPrivilegeEscalation, readOnlyRootFilesystem).

How

pkg/proto/datadog/workloadmeta + comp/core/workloadmeta — add ContainerSecurityContext, Capabilities, SeccompProfile and wire them through Container
pkg/security/resolvers/securitycontext — new WorkloadmetaResolver that reads the container's declared posture and derives the template-slot key by walking OwnerReferences (ReplicaSet → Deployment, Job → CronJob
via the shared pkg/util/kubernetes name-suffix heuristic).
pkg/security/security_profile — Profile now carries a SecurityContexts map[Key]*SecurityContext. ManagerV2 upserts on profile creation

TODO

New release on agent-payload before merging: DataDog/agent-payload#519

github-actions

AI review by Codex (OpenAI) - workflow run

patch is incorrect: the declared security context cannot reach system-probe through the existing remote workloadmeta transport, so the new field remains absent in deployed Agents.

github-actions · 2026-09-08T13:37:04Z

+	container, err := r.wmeta.GetContainer(string(id))
+	if err != nil || container == nil || container.SecurityContext == nil {


[P1] Transport SecurityContext to system-probe before resolving it

System-probe uses workloadmeta.Remote, but Container.SecurityContext is marked proto:"ignore" in comp/core/workloadmeta/def/types.go and is omitted by the workloadmeta protobuf conversions. Consequently, even when the core Agent's kubelet collector populates this field, system-probe receives a container with a nil security context and this resolver always returns nil. Add the field to the remote workloadmeta transport and verify the deployed pipeline so Declared can actually be populated.

dd-octo-sts · 2026-09-08T13:51:37Z

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: f049eb5
Comparison: 50abd39

binary	os	arch	change
system-probe	linux	amd64	+1, -0 +github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/resolvers/securitycontext
system-probe	linux	arm64	+1, -0 +github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/security/resolvers/securitycontext

datadog-prod-us1-4 · 2026-09-08T14:03:12Z

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 77.68%
• Overall Coverage: 57.02% (+0.09%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 50abd39 | Docs | Give us feedback!}

dd-octo-sts · 2026-09-08T14:11:53Z

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor f049eb5d:

Results for datadog-agent_7.85.0~devel.git.669.50abd39.pipeline.140097665-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

Results for datadog-iot-agent_7.85.0~devel.git.669.50abd39.pipeline.140097665-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

dd-octo-sts · 2026-09-08T14:21:19Z

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor f049eb5
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

	Quality gate	Change	Size (prev → curr → max)
✅	agent_deb_amd64	+186.56 KiB (0.02% increase, -5.88% of buffer)	782.879 → 783.061 → 785.980
✅	agent_deb_amd64_fips	+182.41 KiB (0.02% increase, -9.21% of buffer)	717.276 → 717.454 → 719.210
✅	agent_heroku_amd64	+24.34 KiB (0.01% increase, -0.42% of buffer)	317.549 → 317.573 → 323.180
✅	agent_msi	+101.0 KiB (0.02% increase, -0.61% of buffer)	652.555 → 652.654 → 668.830
✅	agent_rpm_amd64	+186.56 KiB (0.02% increase, -5.90% of buffer)	782.863 → 783.045 → 785.950
✅	agent_rpm_amd64_fips	+182.41 KiB (0.02% increase, -9.13% of buffer)	717.260 → 717.438 → 719.210
✅	agent_rpm_arm64	+182.44 KiB (0.02% increase, -4.19% of buffer)	753.665 → 753.843 → 757.920
✅	agent_rpm_arm64_fips	+174.28 KiB (0.02% increase, -4.83% of buffer)	693.455 → 693.625 → 696.980
✅	agent_suse_amd64	+186.56 KiB (0.02% increase, -5.90% of buffer)	782.863 → 783.045 → 785.950
✅	agent_suse_amd64_fips	+182.41 KiB (0.02% increase, -9.13% of buffer)	717.260 → 717.438 → 719.210
✅	agent_suse_arm64	+182.44 KiB (0.02% increase, -4.19% of buffer)	753.665 → 753.843 → 757.920
✅	agent_suse_arm64_fips	+174.28 KiB (0.02% increase, -4.83% of buffer)	693.455 → 693.625 → 696.980
✅	docker_agent_amd64	+178.38 KiB (0.02% increase, -10.54% of buffer)	841.907 → 842.081 → 843.560
✅	docker_agent_arm64	+182.25 KiB (0.02% increase, -4.29% of buffer)	837.730 → 837.908 → 841.880
✅	docker_agent_jmx_amd64	+178.37 KiB (0.02% increase, -10.56% of buffer)	1032.821 → 1032.995 → 1034.470
✅	docker_agent_jmx_arm64	+182.25 KiB (0.02% increase, -4.29% of buffer)	1017.424 → 1017.602 → 1021.570
✅	docker_dogstatsd_amd64	+16.12 KiB (0.04% increase, -1.52% of buffer)	39.406 → 39.421 → 40.440
✅	docker_host_profiler_amd64	+21.73 KiB (0.01% increase, -0.19% of buffer)	308.056 → 308.077 → 319.490
✅	docker_host_profiler_arm64	+9.1 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.08% of buffer)	319.256 → 319.265 → 330.690
✅	dogstatsd_deb_amd64	+12.16 KiB (0.04% increase, -1.11% of buffer)	30.149 → 30.161 → 31.220
✅	dogstatsd_deb_arm64	+12.12 KiB (0.04% increase, -0.83% of buffer)	28.157 → 28.169 → 29.590
✅	dogstatsd_rpm_amd64	+12.16 KiB (0.04% increase, -1.11% of buffer)	30.149 → 30.161 → 31.220
✅	dogstatsd_suse_amd64	+12.16 KiB (0.04% increase, -1.11% of buffer)	30.149 → 30.161 → 31.220
✅	iot_agent_deb_amd64	+8.12 KiB (0.02% increase, -0.82% of buffer)	46.587 → 46.595 → 47.550
✅	iot_agent_deb_arm64	+12.16 KiB (0.03% increase, -1.17% of buffer)	43.204 → 43.216 → 44.220
✅	iot_agent_deb_armhf	+12.08 KiB (0.03% increase, -1.19% of buffer)	44.029 → 44.041 → 45.020
✅	iot_agent_rpm_amd64	+8.12 KiB (0.02% increase, -0.82% of buffer)	46.588 → 46.596 → 47.550
✅	iot_agent_suse_amd64	+8.12 KiB (0.02% increase, -0.82% of buffer)	46.587 → 46.595 → 47.550
✅	docker_cluster_agent_amd64	+8.16 KiB (0.00% increase, -11.47% of buffer)	213.631 → 213.639 → 213.700

4 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)

	Quality gate	Current Size
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64	7.439 MiB
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64	6.877 MiB
✅	docker_dogstatsd_arm64	37.503 MiB
✅	docker_cluster_agent_arm64	226.600 MiB

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-09-08T14:35:55Z

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Job ID: b52a3de2-3432-414f-9cc9-6310d58b4076

Baseline: f049eb5
Comparison: 50abd39
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	+0.98	[+0.11, +1.84]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	+0.73	[+0.50, +0.96]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory utilization	+0.42	[+0.38, +0.45]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	dsd_uds_10mb_3k_timestamped_contexts_memory	memory utilization	+0.32	[+0.10, +0.54]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	+0.24	[+0.19, +0.28]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory utilization	+0.17	[+0.10, +0.24]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_idle	memory utilization	+0.14	[+0.10, +0.17]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	+0.09	[+0.05, +0.12]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	python_openmetrics	% cpu utilization	+0.03	[-0.67, +0.72]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	dsd_uds_10mb_3k_timestamped_contexts_cpu	% cpu utilization	-0.28	[-0.52, -0.04]	1	Logs
➖	dsd_uds_client_drop_detector_cpu	% cpu utilization	-0.39	[-0.89, +0.10]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_private_action_runner	memory utilization	-0.56	[-0.68, -0.43]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	observed_value	links
✅	python_openmetrics	checks_execution_time	10/10	79.37 ≤ 100	bounds checks dashboard
✅	python_openmetrics	cpu_usage	10/10	1334.32 ≤ 1500	bounds checks dashboard
✅	python_openmetrics	memory_usage	10/10	4.33GiB ≤ 4.75GiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	4 ≤ 5	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	175.77MiB ≤ 179MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	total_bytes_received	10/10	750.84KiB ≤ 819.20KiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	4 ≤ 5	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	527.94MiB ≤ 537MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	total_bytes_received	10/10	1.14MiB ≤ 1.25MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	18 ≤ 40	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	214.56MiB ≤ 228MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	total_bytes_received	10/10	263.42MiB ≤ 292MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	369.57 ≤ 2000	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	20 ≤ 40	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	427.05MiB ≤ 455MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	total_bytes_received	10/10	0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_private_action_runner	memory_usage	10/10	73.07MiB ≤ 75MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	cpu_usage	10/10	31.30 ≤ 100	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	memory_usage	10/10	325.24MiB ≤ 355MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	64.15 ≤ 200	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	303.76MiB ≤ 335MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	24.76 ≤ 100	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	318.29MiB ≤ 345MiB	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_private_action_runner, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> # Conflicts: # go.sum

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> # Conflicts: # comp/core/tagger/fx-remote/go.sum # comp/core/tagger/impl-remote/go.sum # comp/logs-library/go.sum # comp/otelcol/collector-contrib/impl/go.sum # comp/otelcol/ddflareextension/impl/go.sum # comp/otelcol/logsagentpipeline/go.sum # comp/otelcol/logsagentpipeline/logsagentpipelineimpl/go.sum # comp/otelcol/otlp/components/exporter/datadogexporter/go.sum # comp/otelcol/otlp/components/exporter/logsagentexporter/go.sum # comp/otelcol/otlp/components/exporter/serializerexporter/go.sum # comp/otelcol/otlp/components/processor/infraattributesprocessor/go.sum # go.sum # internal/qbranch/anomalydetection-testbench/go.sum # pkg/config/remote/go.sum # pkg/process/util/api/go.sum # pkg/proto/go.sum # pkg/serializer/go.sum # pkg/trace/otel/go.sum # pkg/util/grpc/go.sum # test/e2e-framework/go.sum # test/fakeintake/go.sum # test/new-e2e/go.sum # test/otel/go.sum

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

The workspace-wide dda inv tidy after merging main churned 24 nested modules to propagate the agent-payload pseudo-version. That churn is unrelated to this PR's intent: our only genuine dep change is the agent-payload pin in the root go.mod. Restoring those nested files to their origin/main state. Note: this will fail the check-mod-tidy CI gate (which runs 'go work sync' + 'git diff --exit-code **/go.mod **/go.sum'). Accepted for now; will be addressed either by re-adding the sync (if we keep the agent-payload pseudo-version) or by cutting a real agent-payload release and re-pinning to it. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

github-actions

AI review by Codex (OpenAI) - workflow run

The patch is incorrect: a transient workloadmeta miss can permanently omit declared hardening information from an active profile. The added unit tests do not exercise this startup ordering or verify delivery through fakeintake.

github-actions · 2026-09-10T11:55:11Z

 		Start:             eventTime,
 		End:               eventTime,
 	}
+	secprof.Declared = m.resolveDeclared(event.ProcessContext.Process.ContainerContext.ContainerID)


[P2] Retry unresolved posture after profile creation

The remote tagger and remote workloadmeta populate independently, so image tags can be available before workloadmeta contains the container's security context. If this lookup returns nil, getOrCreateProfile subsequently returns the cached profile without resolving it again; the storage backfill only runs when loading a profile. Consequently, a transient startup or container-discovery delay leaves Declared absent for the profile's lifetime even after the data arrives. Retry resolution while the cached profile's Declared is nil, and cover delayed workloadmeta availability in a test.

Mathew-Estafanous · 2026-09-10T19:57:37Z

+	v := *src
+	return &v


nit: can use new(*src) instead of de-ref into a variable and reference again.

Mathew-Estafanous · 2026-09-10T19:57:38Z

+	v := *src
+	return &v


similar nit with new(*src)

Mathew-Estafanous · 2026-09-10T19:57:38Z

+// copyBoolPtr returns a fresh *bool with src's value, or nil if src is nil,
+// so wire-side callers never alias workloadmeta cache storage.
+func copyBoolPtr(src *bool) *bool {


not a big deal but this defensive measure doesn't seem that necessary. This is used for proto streaming - not like it'll be passed around different components. Similar thought with the other copyBoolPtr .

Mathew-Estafanous · 2026-09-10T19:57:38Z

+// copyBoolPtr returns a fresh *bool with src's value, or nil if src is nil.
+func copyBoolPtr(src *bool) *bool {
+	if src == nil {
+		return nil
+	}
+	v := *src
+	return &v
+}


similar nit and thoughts on this method in general.

Mathew-Estafanous · 2026-09-10T19:57:39Z

 	github.com/CycloneDX/cyclonedx-go v0.12.0
 	github.com/DATA-DOG/go-sqlmock v1.5.2
-	github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5 v5.0.209
+	github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5 v5.0.211-0.20260910152323-44bb6d8404c1


Already mentioned in the PR description, but another reminder to pin to a release version instead of a commit hash before merging.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> # Conflicts: # go.mod # go.sum # pkg/proto/pbgo/core/workloadmeta.pb.go

add HardeningDeclared

3b249e8

mftoure added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Sep 8, 2026

github-actions Bot added the component/system-probe label Sep 8, 2026

dd-octo-sts Bot added internal Identify a non-fork PR team/agent-security labels Sep 8, 2026

github-actions Bot added the long review PR is complex, plan time to review it label Sep 8, 2026

github-actions Bot reviewed Sep 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

mftoure and others added 4 commits September 8, 2026 17:35

Merge branch 'main' into momar/secprofiles-add-security-context

5552cff

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> # Conflicts: # go.sum

go mod tidy after merging main

b4f999d

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

go mod tidy (root) for agent-payload pin

3eb039b

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

dd-octo-sts Bot added the team/agent-build label Sep 9, 2026

dd-octo-sts Bot added the team/container-platform The Container Platform Team label Sep 9, 2026

mftoure force-pushed the momar/secprofiles-add-security-context branch from f17c21f to 2c36c3e Compare September 9, 2026 11:20

mftoure added 3 commits September 9, 2026 14:02

get the security context

a16d49e

show properties if empty

0343525

Merge branch 'main' into momar/secprofiles-add-security-context

90e9994

mftoure changed the title ~~add HardeningDeclared~~ [CWS] Add declared hardening infos Sep 10, 2026

mftoure marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2026 11:52

mftoure requested review from a team as code owners September 10, 2026 11:52

github-actions Bot reviewed Sep 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

aiuto approved these changes Sep 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

rename to security context + add missing fields

bfdf0f3

mftoure requested review from a team as code owners September 10, 2026 14:19

dd-octo-sts Bot added team/container-integrations team/kubernetes-experiences labels Sep 10, 2026

lavigne958 approved these changes Sep 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

kangyili approved these changes Sep 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

changes after review - multiple security contexts

26bdd40

Mathew-Estafanous approved these changes Sep 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

spikat reviewed Sep 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

changes after review

27ea7c0

spikat approved these changes Sep 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

mftoure added 6 commits September 17, 2026 14:30

get seccomp filters

39299f0

add syscall arguments

06b6169

try getting the pod's security context

0061e67

try reading the local seccomp file instead of using ptrace

e5df4c7

add test

e5e7ec3

Merge branch 'main' into momar/secprofiles-add-security-context

50abd39

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> # Conflicts: # go.mod # go.sum # pkg/proto/pbgo/core/workloadmeta.pb.go

		container, err := r.wmeta.GetContainer(string(id))
		if err != nil \|\| container == nil \|\| container.SecurityContext == nil {

Conversation

mftoure commented Sep 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What

How

TODO

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot Sep 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Go Package Import Differences

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 • edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Files inventory check summary

Results for datadog-agent_7.85.0~devel.git.669.50abd39.pipeline.140097665-1_amd64.deb:

Results for datadog-iot-agent_7.85.0~devel.git.669.50abd39.pipeline.140097665-1_amd64.deb:

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Static quality checks

Info

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot Sep 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Mathew-Estafanous Sep 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Mathew-Estafanous Sep 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Mathew-Estafanous Sep 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Mathew-Estafanous Sep 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Mathew-Estafanous Sep 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This branch has not been deployed

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

mftoure commented Sep 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 •

edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading