Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scoped written proof with exact finite corroboration, produced by Nick Petalas. For arbitrary finite two-type nonnegative row menus, determine the sharp common contraction rate when positive reserve weights have imbalance at most B >= 1.
The proof supplies the entire feasible weight interval at every rate and shows that rational weights attain the optimum exactly when the optimum is rational, for rational rows and B. A new four-row example has exact law max(1/(2B),sqrt(2)/4). The reserve cap also gives the all-depth abstract relative tail bound B*q^k.
Ali Romman's #6472 supplies the independent adaptive-row contract and explicit common-ratio question. Its existing result is cited, not replayed. Older #6555 solves one uncapped fixture; its menu, identity and cutoff are not used as the main step. Classical Perron roots, positive diagonal scaling and weighted contraction retain their credit; global priority for those methods is unclaimed.
Advance CLAIM. Canonical base e545235; selected frontier unchanged.
Evidence
Before, the cited adaptive-row interface supplied valid common weights without an explicit arbitrary-menu reserve-cap optimum. After, the closed form and complete interval give an exact rational feasibility certificate.
From the repository root:
Another CPython 3.12 executable can replace the host-specific path. Expected markers are PASS_BOUNDED_ADAPTIVE_RESERVES, PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE and PASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES. No predecessor executable, receipt or scientific census is imported.
Limitations
No actual physical supplier menu or reserve consumer is bound. Native realization, complete charges, independent row legality, compiler closure, ownership, stock, precision/tape and analytic recovery remain separate. All five selected framework assumptions remain; there is no new kappa or complete multiplication theorem. Selected cold replay, Lean, Docker, independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed.
The theorem covers arbitrary finite nonnegative real menus. The executable checks rational thresholds with at most sixteen rows per type and 64-bit input numerators/denominators. Its managed-allocation deviation and fixed replay bounds are documented. No shared source or pinned evidence changes.
Open next questions
Related open work
The completion check of this account's open PRs created after the advance CLAIM found no additional PR studying this two-type contraction or reserve-cap quantity.
Main, live PRs and claims were refreshed before committing. Distinctive reserve-cap, general-menu and formula searches found no prior delivery of this result. Sparse omitted notes, arbitrary historical diffs and unpublished work remain coverage limits.
CI notes
CI did not certify this package. At unchanged head
18cd386d47b415fcc6c6cddde9ae1ac3d1c8749e, run 43029125610, plan job 130551298799, failed inOnboarding helper tests. The log reports exactly one failure among 760 tests, with 24 skipped:This failure is inherited from canonical base
e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57:certificates/selected-result.jsonspecifiesmake frontier7000-verify, while the current section ofdocs/ci-verification.mdstill describes #6030 andmake frontier6030-verify. Both base files were read directly; this PR changes only its six package files. Thereplayjob was skipped becauseplanfailed, so no hosted scientific replay ran.The failed-job logs for 42905094314, 42903313790, 43023514635, 43024693032 and 43029249083 were read and each confirms the same exact failing test, missing-command assertion and one-failure/24-skipped summary across 760 tests. No unrelated CI failure is inferred.
Local normal/optimized direct checks, both registered commands, metadata/pins and committed-byte/source-history checks passed as recorded above. Those are local evidence only. The repository navigation repair remains for maintainers; no fix or retrigger commit is added here.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way. Blast radius: one isolated research package and two bounded replay commands. No shared implementation or selected-frontier files change.