Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scoped written proof with exact finite corroboration, produced by Nick Petalas. This answers the polynomial-entry question in unpaidmoon's #7103. In its two literal stage-0 gaps, every pair R,S over K[x] of entry degree at most d satisfying the required coefficient endpoint has an explicit affine parametrization:
The degree-one dimension is 114. Over F_q the bijection gives q^(64d+50) pairs. The finite verifier enumerates entrywise factors of this count; it does not enumerate every full matrix pair. This changes the constant-entry hypothesis and opens couplings through coordinate 1. No new κ, paid-rank gain, native caller or supplier admission is claimed.
Credit unpaidmoon for #7103 at
f3af1384aeda8c75be58f09cb07da3941ba7aba3, the literal word of #7027 at1ba2ac5adfe58fbe9dba34d50d4e5d30633ce3d0, and #7039's coefficient-target distinction. Credit Ali Romman for #5747 and its retained #5673/#5631/#5617 lineage. Those results are cited inputs, not audit targets.Evidence
From the repository root, use the exact local interpreter path below. On another machine, use CPython 3.12 at its corresponding path.
Limitations
The universal quantifiers come from the written proof, with finite computation as corroboration. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed. The insertion entries now depend on x; native legality, implementation, restoration, precision, hosting and a complete signed invoice are unproved. The explicit witness has no established cost advantage over (I,0). No Lean, Docker, selected-frontier replay or complete multiplication implementation was run. The selected frontier is unchanged.
Open next questions
Can the explicit polynomial crossing pair save work once every x-dependent entry is legally implemented and all restoration is charged? First realize R=I-(1+x)E10, S=E10 in the actual interface, then compare its complete bill with (I,0). A legal priced realization is the missing step.
Related open work
Prove rank factor 1 for every-stage paired-star gaps and raise the thin-rank bound to 2q⌈g/3⌉ (no κ) #7126 studies the same paired-star gate family and proves a rank bound for constant internal thin maps under its square condition; this contribution classifies polynomial entries in two fixed gaps and does not compute that rank budget.
Classify two constant insertions after the stage-0 paired-star gates (no κ) #7103 fixes these two gaps and classifies constants; this contribution answers its polynomial-entry question.
Record a valuation-1 factor outside the paired-star T-commutant #7027 supplies the diagonal nine-gate word; its valuation and factorization results are cited without replay.
Prove no constant insertion makes the valuation-1 e coefficient I #7039 treats one-gap insertions and distinguishes coefficient I from coefficient P; this contribution requires P and uses two gaps.
Record the idempotent triples after rows (1, 1, 0, 0) #7040 classifies other idempotent stage factorizations; those gates are not substituted into this word.
Record that one unsplit call per stage still needs thin rank 8 #7086 studies two thin maps in the different unsplit three-call word and asks about polynomial entries there; that rank problem is outside this classification.
CI notes
CI did not certify this package. At head
4268eab9d5bc1293a006d27abf9164d125ff094d, run 43000676071 failed inplan, at job 130455727586. The packagereplayjob was skipped becauseplanfailed.I read the checks once and inspected the job log. The failing step is
Onboarding helper tests: 760 tests ran, exactly one failed, and 24 were skipped. The failure is:The cause is already in base main
e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57:certificates/selected-result.jsonnamesmake frontier7000-verify, whiledocs/ci-verification.mdopens withCurrent selected-family replay: #6030and namesmake frontier6030-verify. Both files and the failing test are unchanged by this PR, which adds onlyresearch/polynomial-two-gap-insertions/.I also read the failed-step logs of 42905094314, 42903313790, 43000211746 (#7189), and 43000790178 (#7192). Each reports the same sole failing test and assertion, with 760 tests and 24 skips.
No fix, retrigger commit, push or job rerun was made for this repository-level failure. Evidence for this package remains local: both registered commands and all required package checks passed as recorded above.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way. Blast Radius: isolated research package. Five new files; no shared implementation, pinned predecessor, selected record or frontier change.