Skip to content

docs(gap): refresh baseline snapshot for post-c7cf34b state - #273

Open
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/gap-baseline-refresh-20260827
Open

docs(gap): refresh baseline snapshot for post-c7cf34b state#273
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/gap-baseline-refresh-20260827

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Operator outcome

Refreshes docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md (the merged #164 register) with the 2026-08-27T02:05:00Z live snapshot against protected-main c7cf34b84d087904bdcb4604479dda2ed8cfcf77.

Records:

Verification

  • Snapshot metadata and open-PR inventory match live GitHub search at publication.
  • Documentation validator requires dated UTC snapshot, 40-character protected-main SHA, and exact-head inventory matching the declared open-PR count.

Do not merge until the unchanged exact head has required checks and two independent approvals (ruleset 18156473). Do not self-approve. Predecessor-head Checks are not merge evidence.

No duplicate gap-baseline PR was open at creation time.


Open in Devin Review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 문서
    • 제품-기술 격차 기준선 스냅샷을 2026년 8월 27일 상태로 갱신했습니다.
    • 보호된 기본 브랜치 상태와 관련 분석 실행 정보를 최신화했습니다.
    • 표준화 맵 복구 대기열 및 심리측정 복구 항목을 추가했습니다.
    • 오픈 PR 및 초안 현황과 증거 표를 최신 목록으로 교체했습니다.
    • 이전 상태 노트와 일부 과거 섹션을 정리하고 새로 고침 규칙을 수정했습니다.

Operator register only. No Buyer language. Exact open-PR count 6
(5 non-draft psychometric std maps + 1 draft event composition).
Protected-main evidence c7cf34b (analysis-run status HTTP #266).
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

Next included review available in 4 minutes.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f3c4ae17-d687-4218-9926-24fd4b3e79ce

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f6c8a5 and 8e58e06.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

기술 격차 기준선 문서를 2026-08-27T02:05:00Z 기준으로 갱신했습니다. 보호된 main 증거, 복구 대기열, PR 현황, 상태 노트, 새로 고침 규칙을 업데이트했습니다.

Changes

기준선 스냅샷 문서

Layer / File(s) Summary
스냅샷 증거와 복구 대기열
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
2026-08-27 복구 대기열과 심리측정 복구 슬라이스를 추가했습니다. 보호된 main SHA, 스냅샷 시각, 오픈 PR 및 초안 수, PR 증거 목록을 갱신했습니다. 이전 Event Lineage 및 상태 노트를 제거했습니다.
새로 고침 규칙 갱신
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
활성 PR 기능을 병합하고 정확한 헤드를 검증한 뒤 보호된 main을 갱신하도록 규칙을 수정했습니다. 레지스터 설명을 유지하고 이전 문구를 제거했습니다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: 🟡 Moderate · up to 7f6c8

The snapshot is not fully reproducible because four listed pull requests lack their exact 40-character head SHAs, so the documented inventory does not satisfy its stated validation contract. Merge should wait until those entries are corrected.

Suggested reviewers: cursoragent

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed 제목은 docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md의 기준선 스냅샷을 c7cf34b 이후 상태로 갱신하는 주요 변경 사항을 정확하고 간결하게 설명합니다.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/gap-baseline-refresh-20260827

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

…ad register

Restore the operator-gap register and validation contract that the prior
refresh slice removed: keep 'Closure evidence' closure rows, exact 40-char
current-head SHAs for the seven open PRs (#267-#273), the open-PR count, and
the negated queued-checks wording required by
scripts/validate_documentation.py. Update snapshot stamp to
2026-08-27T07:35:00Z and protected-main evidence to c7cf34b (merge of
#266).

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 2 new potential issues.

Devin Review

Comment on lines +305 to 306
| [#267](https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/TEPP/pull/267) | Driver p.16 `asymDIFFUSIONstd` restore (GAP-006 recovery family) | Exact-head Required Checks must pass on the current head plus independent review before merge; re-dispatch superseded exact-head evidence. |
## Delivery sequence

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 Info: No blank line before the Delivery sequence heading

The last row of the priority pull-request queue table is now immediately followed by ## Delivery sequence with no blank line. GFM still breaks the table at the heading so it renders, but every other table-to-heading transition in this file keeps a blank separator.

Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

| Workspace members | 58 unique Rust crates | The repository is modular, but the approved target still lacks complete semantic, compute, psychometric-engine, event-intelligence, interpretation, artifact, and visual product boundaries. |
| Workspace version | `0.2.0` (aligned across every crate manifest) | A version number alone does not establish a supported product release; no signed artifact or support policy exists yet. |
| Open pull requests | **7** | Active queue: #267 asymDIFFUSIONstd, #268 TRAITVARstd, #269 TDT/CHRONOS composition, #270 MANIFESTTRAITVARstd, #271 MANIFESTVARstd, #272 TIPREDVARstd, #273 gap-baseline refresh (this PR). |
| Draft pull requests | **0** | No drafts are open at this snapshot; the previously referenced repair and life-cycle orchestration drafts are closed. |

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Draft count may not match live GitHub

The register claims 0 open drafts and marks #269 as non-draft, which is internally consistent and passes the validator. The PR author's own description instead calls #269 a draft with an open count of 6. If #269 is a draft on live GitHub, these entries are stale.

Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant