Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -74,6 +74,12 @@ All notable changes to this project are documented here. Format follows
authorized leftover store as the period-report list; they do not
invent a leftover score.

### Changed

- ADRs 0011 and 0065 now include APA 7th References for the dated W3C
PROV-O and PROV-DM Recommendations (30 April 2013). Decisions are
unchanged.

### Fixed

- Structure adjudication now rejects malformed or duplicate unit indexes before
Expand Down
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions docs/adr/0011-prov-o-standard-relations.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -77,3 +77,9 @@ erDiagram
- Exact registry tests for 30 classes, 50 properties, 6 datatype properties, 14 qualification mappings, and all 44 object-property inverse names.
- Behavior-sensitive tests for validation, subclass domains, every qualification implication, superproperty closure, inverse/symmetry, direct time inference, RDF serialization, SQL seed completeness, support-profile mapping, and public docstrings.
- Owned production module statement and branch coverage: 100%.

## References (APA 7th)

Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., & McGuinness, D. (Eds.). (2013, April 30). *PROV-O: The PROV Ontology* [W3C Recommendation]. World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/

Moreau, L., & Missier, P. (Eds.). (2013, April 30). *PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model* [W3C Recommendation]. World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-dm-20130430/
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions docs/adr/0065-prov-o-provenance-boundary.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,3 +36,9 @@ literal provenance indistinguishable from a navigational edge.
- The database and materializer are more extensive than a flat edge table.
- Navigation consumers get a compact projection while provenance consumers get
the full standards contract.

## References (APA 7th)

Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., & McGuinness, D. (Eds.). (2013, April 30). *PROV-O: The PROV Ontology* [W3C Recommendation]. World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/

Moreau, L., & Missier, P. (Eds.). (2013, April 30). *PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model* [W3C Recommendation]. World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-dm-20130430/
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions docs/adr/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ decision from them.
| [`image-content-schema.md`](../image-content-schema.md) | [0066](0066-position-preserving-image-content.md) |
| [`storybook-inventory.md`](../storybook-inventory.md) | [0118](0118-uiux-standard-guide-v3-design-overhaul.md), [0184](0184-ontology-provenance-explorer.md) |

[0011](0011-prov-o-standard-relations.md) and [0065](0065-prov-o-provenance-boundary.md) cite the dated W3C PROV-O and PROV-DM Recommendations (https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/ and https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-dm-20130430/).

Files under `docs/doctoring/` remain non-normative supporting evidence even
when this map links them to an ADR. Runtime-evidence files record observed
results for already-decided behavior.
Loading