Skip to content

docs: cd into commit-plus after clone - #31

Merged
Tranthanh98 merged 1 commit into
Commit-Plus:mainfrom
kuishou68:cocoon-fix-commit-plus
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

Tranthanh98 merged 1 commit into
Commit-Plus:mainfrom
kuishou68:cocoon-fix-commit-plus

Conversation

@kuishou68

@kuishou68 kuishou68 commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The clone URL creates a commit-plus folder, but the setup steps say cd macgit. That folder only holds the app sources. macgit.xcodeproj is at the repo root, so open and xcodebuild fail if you follow the docs as written.

Use cd commit-plus so the later commands run from the repository root.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the repository cloning instructions to use the commit-plus directory. This keeps the documented setup steps aligned with the directory users should enter after cloning.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: ee6fcf60-7612-4f17-982c-cff68d2ae44d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4cf89c and ee173e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CONTRIBUTING.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The contributor clone instructions now enter the commit-plus directory instead of macgit.

Changes

Contributor setup

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update clone directory
CONTRIBUTING.md
The clone instructions now enter commit-plus instead of macgit.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: tranthanh98

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to ee173

The contributor setup instructions point to the correct project location, so this change is ready to merge.

Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to ee173

The change affects 1 system.

Changed systems: CONTRIBUTING.md

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Systems and components

  • observed — CONTRIBUTING.md (service) was modified; 1 changed file maps to changed impact.

Before / after behavior

  • observed — Modified behavior in CONTRIBUTING.md: The clone instructions now enter commit-plus rather than macgit.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the documentation change to use cd commit-plus after cloning. It matches the primary change in the pull request.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create a new PR

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Tranthanh98
Tranthanh98 merged commit 829a31c into Commit-Plus:main Sep 29, 2026
1 check passed
@Tranthanh98

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for contributing ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants