Skip to content

ci(coderabbit-config): refresh the vendored CodeRabbit schema - #438

Open
cloud-code-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/refresh-coderabbit-schema
Open

cloud-code-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/refresh-coderabbit-schema

Conversation

@cloud-code-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upstream's CodeRabbit config schema has drifted from the copy vendored here, which is what coderabbit-config-validate.yml grades every enrolled repo against.

Added properties (1):

  • reviews.review_info

Before merging, check the tightened-cap section above if there is one: a lowered maxLength retroactively invalidates configs nobody has touched, and merging this makes their next PR red. Landing the cleanup alongside is usually the right order.

The unit suite ran green against the proposed schema in this run — it asserts the facts the checker's messages rest on, so a refresh that would silently redefine the check cannot slip through unnoticed.

Merging this touches .github/coderabbit-config/**, which triggers bump-coderabbit-config-callers.yml and rolls the SHA-pinned caller fleet forward.

Opened by the refresh-coderabbit-schema workflow.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 777d3ba2-77e0-4748-abac-6608eaa94beb

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants