Skip to content

NEGATIVE TEST: inconsistent uv.lock must fail lint (will be deleted) - #81

Closed
Cipher208 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/lock-negative
Closed

Cipher208 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci/lock-negative

Conversation

@Cipher208

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Temporary. Proves the new uv lock --check step actually fails the lint job on drift, rather than merely passing on a consistent lock. Will be closed and the branch deleted.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Cipher208

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Negative test passed: the new step failed the lint job on drift (all other lint steps green). Deleting the branch.

@Cipher208 Cipher208 closed this Oct 6, 2026
@Cipher208
Cipher208 deleted the ci/lock-negative branch October 6, 2026 23:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant